Strict logic has no room for speculation

*It is based on probability*

Welcome to logic

No premise is 100% known.

None.

>using speculation about the future to draw conclusions about the present

Of course.

Welcome to science.

You are finally understanding the world. as the 'experts' predict

>believing in the free will meme
welcome to nihilism

The scientific method is based on observation of events, not prediction

What is a hypothesis?

A statement which has yet to be proved by observations

Hooray.

Well, the best hypothesis' are based on strong observation and intuition.

No magic. Just good old human observation.

Sometimes it works.

That's called science.

Prediction is the based of theory.

Maybe its right, maybe not.

that's not falsifiable

But if someone has a good reason ( the prediction worked int he past) then it has strong reason for valid hypothesis.

Which is also the basis of simulation theory.

@Deleted User I lol'd (again), but his person is might be my adopted son, so be nice. Also, good to see you back friend.

the falsifiable meme is uniquely autistic

There are even good reason why Karl Popper's idea is wrong.

I didn't even need to get into it.

lets hear it

Why would I, waste of KJs.

Why, are you busy?

It's just so... extensive.

Google it.

Maybe tomorrow.

I explain too much on this server. I'm on my break.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Criticisms

🦆

Haha

This wiki is okay for doing the criticisms.

As you can see there is like 10 parts.

wikipedia is underrated, you can go as deep as you want with their references

Meh