That's the first premise.
You shoudl read Nick Bostrom.
>may achieve How can it be a logical premise if it's speculation
Exactly.
It is based on probability.
If you use that as a premise everything that follows will be speculation
Strict logic has no room for speculation
*It is based on probability*
Welcome to logic
No premise is 100% known.
None.
>using speculation about the future to draw conclusions about the present
Of course.
Welcome to science.
You are finally understanding the world. as the 'experts' predict
>believing in the free will meme welcome to nihilism
The scientific method is based on observation of events, not prediction
What is a hypothesis?
A statement which has yet to be proved by observations
Hooray.
Well, the best hypothesis' are based on strong observation and intuition.
No magic. Just good old human observation.
Sometimes it works.
That's called science.
Prediction is the based of theory.
Maybe its right, maybe not.
that's not falsifiable
But if someone has a good reason ( the prediction worked int he past) then it has strong reason for valid hypothesis.
Which is also the basis of simulation theory.
@Deleted User I lol'd (again), but his person is might be my adopted son, so be nice. Also, good to see you back friend.
the falsifiable meme is uniquely autistic
There are even good reason why Karl Popper's idea is wrong.
I didn't even need to get into it.
lets hear it
Why would I, waste of KJs.
Why, are you busy?
It's just so... extensive.
Google it.
Maybe tomorrow.
I explain too much on this server. I'm on my break.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Criticisms
