You can, actually. Shall we?

Sure

You still technically choose that reality as well

The basis of simulation theory is bases on the fact that in the future humans may achieve a technology able to recreate the past.

That's the first premise.

You shoudl read Nick Bostrom.

>may achieve
How can it be a logical premise if it's speculation

Exactly.

It is based on probability.

If you use that as a premise everything that follows will be speculation

Strict logic has no room for speculation

*It is based on probability*

Welcome to logic

No premise is 100% known.

None.

>using speculation about the future to draw conclusions about the present

Of course.

Welcome to science.

You are finally understanding the world. as the 'experts' predict

>believing in the free will meme
welcome to nihilism

The scientific method is based on observation of events, not prediction

What is a hypothesis?

A statement which has yet to be proved by observations

Hooray.

Well, the best hypothesis' are based on strong observation and intuition.

No magic. Just good old human observation.

Sometimes it works.

That's called science.

Prediction is the based of theory.

Maybe its right, maybe not.

that's not falsifiable

But if someone has a good reason ( the prediction worked int he past) then it has strong reason for valid hypothesis.

Which is also the basis of simulation theory.

@Deleted User I lol'd (again), but his person is might be my adopted son, so be nice. Also, good to see you back friend.

the falsifiable meme is uniquely autistic

There are even good reason why Karl Popper's idea is wrong.

I didn't even need to get into it.

lets hear it

Why would I, waste of KJs.

Why, are you busy?

It's just so... extensive.