better than becoming a terrorist infested shithole & most dangerous country in the world I guess

I'm arguing every dominant country does interventionism

only capitalism kills with it then?

regardless of system

No the soviets do too

you've gone around in a circle

Stop trying to pretend you're making sense

And get to the argument

You've still made no account of the differing motives for intervention

"The War in Vietnam to “beat Communism” and maintain an Asian sphere of influence – 3,800,000 Vietnamese between 1955-1984 [46] about 58,000 US soldiers [47] about 200,000 in Laos [48] about 300,000 in Cambodia [49] it’s hard to calculate Agent Orange deaths but up to 4,800,000 people were exposed [50] and 100,000 US soldiers killed themselves"

The motives do not matter

"beat Communism"

Interventionism is interventionism

"beat Communism"

''free the people from capitalism''

GOOD MOTIVE

kill all you want, your motive is good!

you're going to have to give me some examples and sources as to how these deaths compare

You're the one claiming it;'s a capitalism only thing

lolwut

When did I claim that?

Attributing deaths from interventionism to capitalism, the dumb article you shared

Third time I've posted this "I gave it as food for thought versus the "Communist Death Toll" meme, I hadn't read it all."

if you disagree, it's your job to defend capitalism's legacy

not mine to defend communism's

I'm not a communist

I'm just debunking the idiotic idea that capitalism is somehow more interventionist than other systems

And what are you then?

Where did you debunk this? You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement

which is completely untrue

Because interventionism happens regardless, and the U.S was more isolationist when they were more free market than they are now

then why invade Vietnam?

To spread their influence in asia, as I already said

"interventionism happens regardless" < this betrays your true motive

''You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement'' See north and south korea

Glorious chinese backed north korea

no death there

to assert interventionism without providing a solid incentive as to why a country would expend resources to affect a change in government is your fallacy

<:lenin:322125387297456131> I AM ALIVE COMRADES!

yo

There was always an incentive to intervene in other countries to install a more friendly government