Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 344172604216573965


2017-08-07 17:34:28 UTC  

"beat Communism"

2017-08-07 17:34:34 UTC  

''free the people from capitalism''

2017-08-07 17:34:37 UTC  

GOOD MOTIVE

2017-08-07 17:34:47 UTC  

kill all you want, your motive is good!

2017-08-07 17:34:55 UTC  

you're going to have to give me some examples and sources as to how these deaths compare

2017-08-07 17:35:11 UTC  

You're the one claiming it;'s a capitalism only thing

2017-08-07 17:35:17 UTC  

lolwut

2017-08-07 17:35:24 UTC  

When did I claim that?

2017-08-07 17:35:34 UTC  

Attributing deaths from interventionism to capitalism, the dumb article you shared

2017-08-07 17:35:55 UTC  

Third time I've posted this "I gave it as food for thought versus the "Communist Death Toll" meme, I hadn't read it all."

2017-08-07 17:36:18 UTC  

if you disagree, it's your job to defend capitalism's legacy

2017-08-07 17:36:23 UTC  

not mine to defend communism's

2017-08-07 17:36:29 UTC  

I'm not a communist

2017-08-07 17:36:56 UTC  

I'm just debunking the idiotic idea that capitalism is somehow more interventionist than other systems

2017-08-07 17:37:18 UTC  

And what are you then?

2017-08-07 17:37:49 UTC  

Where did you debunk this? You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement

2017-08-07 17:37:53 UTC  

which is completely untrue

2017-08-07 17:38:35 UTC  

Because interventionism happens regardless, and the U.S was more isolationist when they were more free market than they are now

2017-08-07 17:38:46 UTC  

then why invade Vietnam?

2017-08-07 17:39:00 UTC  

To spread their influence in asia, as I already said

2017-08-07 17:39:03 UTC  

"interventionism happens regardless" < this betrays your true motive

2017-08-07 17:39:34 UTC  

''You posted an article to suggest Chinese involvement in Vietnam could've resulted in as much as/more death than the US's involvement'' See north and south korea

2017-08-07 17:39:42 UTC  

Glorious chinese backed north korea

2017-08-07 17:39:54 UTC  

no death there

2017-08-07 17:39:59 UTC  

to assert interventionism without providing a solid incentive as to why a country would expend resources to affect a change in government is your fallacy

2017-08-07 17:40:07 UTC  

<:lenin:322125387297456131> I AM ALIVE COMRADES!

2017-08-07 17:40:11 UTC  

yo

2017-08-07 17:41:02 UTC  

There was always an incentive to intervene in other countries to install a more friendly government

2017-08-07 17:41:12 UTC  

If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you

2017-08-07 17:41:47 UTC  

Installing a more friendly government is a one-off event contingent on the previous government being unfriendly

2017-08-07 17:41:54 UTC  

Profiteering is a continuous process

2017-08-07 17:41:58 UTC  

profiteering never ends

2017-08-07 17:42:03 UTC  

as long as there is profit to be had

2017-08-07 17:42:10 UTC  

doesn't make sense

2017-08-07 17:42:30 UTC  

what the soviets did in eastern europe was not a one off event fam

2017-08-07 17:42:37 UTC  

neither what china did in north korea

2017-08-07 17:42:50 UTC  

ugh

2017-08-07 17:43:48 UTC  

nasty anti-communist government overthrown = gone, no more intervention
nasty anti-capitalist government overthrown = gone, continuous intervention to harvest resources

2017-08-07 17:44:18 UTC  

capitalism is good for harvesting resources yes, unlike socialism

2017-08-07 17:44:21 UTC  

even if we are to take your false dichotomy at face value

2017-08-07 17:44:23 UTC  

LOL