hahaha

The Jews did 9/11.

So trying to subvert other countries is okay as long as free trade is not a part of it?

What's the logic in that?

"""subvert"""

It's still interventionism

but not wholesale death for the purposes of profiteering, in other words *it wouldn't go in the article*

just saying it's interventionism offers no account for levels of suffering enacted by said interventionism

oh good I'm sure the dead give a shit about your motive

in fact

Someone tell the Afghani's that the soviet union wanted only good for them!

by agreeing that they're both 'interventionism' you're tacitly admitting that capitalism can be roughly compared to communism in the scope of its death

arguable

Tell the Polish!

better than becoming a terrorist infested shithole & most dangerous country in the world I guess

I'm arguing every dominant country does interventionism

only capitalism kills with it then?

regardless of system

No the soviets do too

you've gone around in a circle

Stop trying to pretend you're making sense

And get to the argument

You've still made no account of the differing motives for intervention

"The War in Vietnam to “beat Communism” and maintain an Asian sphere of influence – 3,800,000 Vietnamese between 1955-1984 [46] about 58,000 US soldiers [47] about 200,000 in Laos [48] about 300,000 in Cambodia [49] it’s hard to calculate Agent Orange deaths but up to 4,800,000 people were exposed [50] and 100,000 US soldiers killed themselves"

The motives do not matter

"beat Communism"

Interventionism is interventionism

"beat Communism"

''free the people from capitalism''

GOOD MOTIVE

kill all you want, your motive is good!

you're going to have to give me some examples and sources as to how these deaths compare

You're the one claiming it;'s a capitalism only thing

lolwut

When did I claim that?

Attributing deaths from interventionism to capitalism, the dumb article you shared

Third time I've posted this "I gave it as food for thought versus the "Communist Death Toll" meme, I hadn't read it all."

if you disagree, it's your job to defend capitalism's legacy

not mine to defend communism's

I'm not a communist

I'm just debunking the idiotic idea that capitalism is somehow more interventionist than other systems