economic freedom isn't negative freedom

Whilst positive freedoms are different in their nature; they are a freedom to purpose.

Most all of freedom to thought fall under this.

It is.

The market is a perfect example of negative freedoms at kwor.

*work

Why do you disagree with self determination and individualism?

you cannot control every aspect of somebody

sure, some people may find postive freedom in the market. But this is the overwhelming majority that don't.

Did I say that?

I already know your views

you want authoritarianism in most areas of life

you don't want economic freedom

nor freedom of political expression

Not really.

I mean, the expression of ideals are important.

Except that it is a one state

I adhear to a belief in a single party democracy.

one party state

LIke how they had in the USSR and Thrid Reich

there were mass meetings, especially so in the USSR, and the people would hold scurtinty to the party members

every working man who wished to attend was allowed to, and any question could be asked.

They still hold no power

no influence on them

A party member was reviewed on their life, their-

it is merely a mind game

No?

you feel as though you influence it

They elect their party member who would go on to repersent them.

but it's ultimately up to the rulers

No...

No it is not.

Fuck, Stalin himself was payed less then a doctor

Doesn't matter how much they were paid

they still hold the power

How can you opt for so much control over somebody?

How profoundedly numb skulled can he go?

single party democracy, might as well go for monarchy

Did I say that?

Your politics say it

I am asking for justification