Message from @Anglican
Discord ID: 344767905478606848
you don't want economic freedom
nor freedom of political expression
Not really.
I mean, the expression of ideals are important.
Except that it is a one state
I adhear to a belief in a single party democracy.
one party state
LIke how they had in the USSR and Thrid Reich
there were mass meetings, especially so in the USSR, and the people would hold scurtinty to the party members
every working man who wished to attend was allowed to, and any question could be asked.
They still hold no power
no influence on them
A party member was reviewed on their life, their-
it is merely a mind game
No?
you feel as though you influence it
They elect their party member who would go on to repersent them.
but it's ultimately up to the rulers
No...
No it is not.
Doesn't matter how much they were paid
they still hold the power
How can you opt for so much control over somebody?
How profoundedly numb skulled can he go?
single party democracy, might as well go for monarchy
Did I say that?
Your politics say it
I am asking for justification
you realise how bad life would be by that
for the individual
bad as in little freedom
No, they don't. The entire point is to rid ourselves of mud in the wheels democracy in the west while maintaning our freedom to resist the government without resorting to the rifle.
Every citizen has a say, and leaders would be scrutinized as needed.
except that you want limit economic freedom
_painful sigh_
Of course I want to limit economic freedom.
to what extent
It is not a good freedom
it is certainly
it's good for the individual