It is a gigantic task to theorise ML into the modern context, which is why I ultimately abandoned it.

Maybe not something one person can do?

No, one person can lead it, and this even seems to be the way theory develops, with one person doing the majority of idea forming. Again, this is the pragmatism of authoritarianism shining through.

Be clear though, revolution is everything. This is the first started point. If it is unrealistic then nothing else can follow. It is the first domino, and the hardest to achieve. After that momentum takes over.

When leftypol gave Prachandism as one of the choices of political ideologies board believes in I was like wtf is this

Unfortunately they gave away power just like the Vietnamese puppets who succeeded Khmer Rouge

Best Chad meme out there tbh

^ Lmao

Well, one person doing most of it. So that means I can have help from others 🤔

You should know.

Don't take too much advice from an Anarchist.

Yea I take everything you say with a grain of salt

But if I work with other MLs could we possibly improve the idea with us all working together?

Of course, but in my experience the dynamic of theory development tends to find a gravity in one person or a small group of persons.

>small group of persons
That's what I said

I think I can do this

Just take it one topic at a time

See you in 10-20 years.

Haha well I have time then

Give me a couple months

👀

@National Trotskyist yes?

Good luck, mate.

is this pic relevent to the dissussion at hand?

Yea it's Chopin irl

Hey, how did you get my tinder pic?

More like Grindr @Deleted User

Oh no, my secret.

heresy

As if

Jesus was too much of a pussy to be a commie.

>muh pacifism

Me-ao

I'd rather bust a nut