But, when society falls apart, and there is no governing force or morals, I would have to imagine that slavery, prostitution, cartels, and more would become common place, because there is no central authority that is against them, organizations could make laws that would make such things legal.

Government =/= society

I mean to be clear, anarchy =/= chaos

@Wilhelm Zaisser#5032 Society today depends on the governments of today, it is a need, not them being the same.

it would require a vast bureacracy and complex institutiosn to manage

there'd be order

and it would take a massive upheaval to diminish that order just like most societies today

Order is dependant on some form of authority to enforce it, otherwise people would not listen or obey to it.

Anarchism also removes most of the incentives people have to commit crime. Private property of course, should be abolished.

*Without God, morality wouldn't exist*

there's a natural order to thing

that can be imposed throughinstitutions

people can self organize

@Railing Yes, when you make everything legal, then crime rates will drop 100%.

we don't hierarchical structures in place to organize people

Not because people stop doing them, but because it is not defined as a crime anymore.

moreover leader would naturally arise to assist in organizing

ehh, no there'd still be the concept of crime in an anarchist society

most anarchists aren't opposed to the law

they're just opposed to the current laws

But what if people refuse to listen to their orders? Because coercion would not be allowed, then people would be free to not have to listen to any rules.

in an anarchist society there wouldn't be any authority to enforce laws, laws would be collectively enforced

yes

>Collectively enforced
By whom?

the peeps

Thats right people would be free to not listen to any rules

as long as they aren't harming others

What if a gang of people collectively decide to commit mass murder and rape on a village? Would that be considered collective enforcement of their policies?

they they're harming others

any society can act in self defense

>implying bourgeois government isn't already a criminal organisation

they're also betraying anarchist principles

Dante went full anarchist

"Muh evil State"

although I don't see why a group would want to commit genocide agaisnt another ubder anarchism

@Railing No shit, any society can act in self defense, but dosen't the core principles of anarchism make them valid if what they believing they are doing is just and fair in their eyes?

no because anarchism has its own principles

being anti-authoritarian also means being anti-genocide

You cannot expect each other to all get in a big circle and hold hands and sing kumbiah, people are always going to wage war against each other.

well national anarchism is a thing

What an oxymoron.