assumtion of value

survival mechanism basically

https://theredphoenixapl.org/2011/06/02/the-human-nature-argument/ this argument is pretty interesting too

I will read what you posted

Dna doesn't dictate what human tendencies are @Deleted User

Competition for survival =/= competition to amass wealth

wealth=survival

The second source you posted still doesn't actually explain anything about human nature being static

Capital accumulation is not the same as surviving

saving money for your children?

Regardless, you have to be pretty retarded to think you can "disprove" communism by saying "muh human nature"

fair enough, but working to reach survival introduces the person to concepts of gaining wealth

Apparently Marx and Engels, all communist intellectuals and revolutions never thought about human nature

fucking debunked dude

all these books

debunked

"To look at people in capitalist society and conclude that human nature is egoism, is like looking at people in a factory where pollution is destroying their lungs and saying that it is human nature to cough."

Apparently the world goes round because disbanding morality for self-interest is human nature

It is human nature to survive, to eat, to breathe, to socialize, ect.

Amassing wealth is a complex behavior

but it's a learned behavior

Keep in mind that in communism, the work needed is reduced

Because of advanced automation of productive forces

There's a bunch of people who make just enough money to "survive" and don't get ambitious beyond that

Sometimes yes

Amassing a shit ton of money is not everyone's end goal

be a good communist party members

be a good slave

Most arguments against communism are pretty retarded

They're just regurgitated

and are really short thought

as I said

you can't seriously think human nature debunks all of Marx's work, along with later Communist figureheads

>go back in time

>tell marx that communism doesnt work because muh human nature

>he never writes so communism never exists

how to prevent communism from ever happening

but china type of communism work very well

China became revisionist a long time ago

You can't effectively have socialism in an undeveloped country.

"Soviet America will not have to imitate our bureaucratic methods. Among us the lack of the bare necessities has caused an intense scramble for an extra loaf of bread, an extra yard of cloth by everyone. In this struggle our bureaucracy steps forward as a conciliator, as an all-powerful court of arbitration. You, on the other hand, are much wealthier and would have little difficulty in supplying all of your people with all of the necessities of life. Moreover, your needs, tastes and habits would never permit your bureaucracy to divide the national income. Instead, when you organize your society to produce for human needs rather than private profits, your entire population will group itself around new trends and groups, which will struggle with one another and prevent an overweening bureaucracy from imposing itself upon them." -Leon Trotsky, *If America Should Go Communist*