i'm not sure where this comes from

I'm not interested in ideas as much as dealing with the problems that underly humans believing in them, even when you can easily prove otherwise.

Simply put, proof isn't always enough.

that statement makes no sense though

I don't want to deny them, but the problem is valuing that correlation too much.

but what do you mean by this

whats the issue with valuing that correlation

Why do no academic professionals agree with "race realism"

because they dont want to seem racist

political correctness

That's stupid

if they say that then they receieve no more funding

simple

Wow, we have an centrist extemist here

Alright. To help answer that question, I have to ask, why is it important to you?

who's the centrist extremist @Cotton

because

if iq correlates with life success, that explains everything

it is very important

@Chillin Chum seems like one

I don't believe that. I know better then that.

From what I can gather with reading 2 messages

@Cotton So? Your point being?

Ah yeah

They're an enlightened centrist

Do I have to make a point

There is no point

wait i need to finish this

There is no true meaning behind any of these

Anyways this is irrelevant right now

if iq is not real then explain apes

explain dogs

This retard is trying to suggest that the bell curve is true

are they just "uneducated?"

<:annoyed:366578993320689665>

why arent they all millionaires in our society?

why arent we praising our animal overlords?

You can't compare humans and apes when it comes to intellectual capability because they have an entirely different development

Iq doesn't sufficiently represent all aspects of intelligence. Now, admittedly, I could do lots more research to tell you how. But I haven't bothered yet because I knew I had enough of an answer through many experiences.

Human brain development is what allows for advanced cognitive ability, animals do not have this

I understand that isn't enough, I can't prove a thing to you. But I can question it.