Message from @Chillin Chum
Discord ID: 385582006047735831
So the main difference between capitalists and fascists is the idea of whether people should be told to work based on their strengths or have the freedom to work based on their interests
And, yes, I've had to tone it down for myself as well, and I'm still working on it.
@Chillin Chum It is not just that, everybody needs to realize that they can be so much more! If people do not realize this, then we are bound to forever be a weak and pitiful society, surrounded by filth that we produce!
I get it, raise the bar.
@Brickiest Brick Well, if you look at it from an economic standpoint.
Well I see that as more of a moral difference that is at the center of each system
But, I'm not facist, so there's something that might be off here and there.
One values freedom while the other values efficiency
And if I hear about another facist regime killing people again on unfounded preceptions....
@Chillin Chum That is one of the things we are so fanatical over, we want everybody to achieve the greatest that they can possibly achieve as a whole, and with that, we also want them to put their efforts into benefiting society as well!
Even if it's done at the barrel of a gun?
Using fear tactics?
Here’s where the moral differences come in
I want the same thing, but I have no interest in the methods.
@Chillin Chum YES!
Well, that's where we diverge.
I value freedom to make mistakes over that.
Even if it means not everything will be perfect.
I would meet somewhere in the middle here
Now I’m gonna go ahead and ask
Unfortunately, at that point, things get more esoteric.
Wouldn’t a person who is doing something they’re interested in do a better job?
Not always, brick.
Rather than being forced to do it even if they dislike it?
Well, sure. Yeah.
But passions don't always make good careers either.
That is true and I’m aware of that fact
@Brickiest Brick Now that is a good question, my answer would be, if they do good at it, and are productive when working at it, and do their best job when doing so, then sure, let them at it.
Yeah I will agree with that then
However, if what they produce is still shit, then that is an issue they will have to sort out, either by practice, or by seeking something different.
Give an example of that scenario
So, happy to see that "radical centrist" can actually agree with you on something?
Even if he doesn't appreciate things being perfect?
@Brickiest Brick It is a little hard to describe in full detail, but say a person who works passionately at a job, but the item they produce at a factory is low quality, and he takes longer to produce the item, then he would have to practice until he became better at doing his job, or he would have to persue another job that he is compitent at.
That's not entirely different from what I see around here.
Well my view is this, if they are really and truly interested and dedicated to doing their job, eventually they will excel at it
Yes, practice does make perfect after all.
So if this person is making a shit product now, in time he may make the best product if he really likes doing it
Yes, that is what I am talking about, when I say that he should be given time to practice to become compitent in producing it.
Is there some kind of threshold or balance system for determining how “well-suited” a person is to assign them to a job?