>you think communism results in other ppl carrying your load
That's capitalism

"Ok """"free thinker"""" " Yeah this is the opposite from conformism

Getting other people to work for you

No one carries your load in capitalism

you have to engineer everything yourself

capitalism is not having other carry your load, it is expoiting others

Lmao what

in communism whith no class you have other more productive workers carry your load

Making others work for you while you don't work at all is pure capitalism

this is so calming to some incels

it is expoitation, as it goes beyond just carrying a load

nuance

Which is worse

jesus fuck

did i say it wasnt

And so how do you get people to carry your load for you in communism?

im pointing out the nuance, you think that capitalism is carrying some one elses load, it isnt as it isnt just the load tyou are carrying, its is more then just the load that is gained by the one who exploits

the exploiter gets more then just a load

so what you said is wrong, as it lacks that nuance

The exploiter gains your whole load, but gives you a slither back as a wage

"nd so how do you get people to carry your load for you in communism?" by being a unproductive worker, you still get all the benifits but some one else is working harder

how ever what you get is only " a load "

No work, no food

No benefits

No luxuries

Simple as that

Only the "no food" thing in extreme circumstances

do you get that the load is means of existance, beyond the load which is the expoitation part is luxeries

But otherwise just no benefits

hypotecical question as you dont get it

communism you get means of existance, exploitation by capitalism results in some one getting more then just the "load"

In a communist system you could have some one else carry your load, and this happens as there is class differnce in ppl

```we just need eugenics and racial seperation and even class seperation, considering not every "worker" produces the same```

That would itself require some kind of racial cooperation. If communities do not want to mix with each other, that's up to them. Ultimately the focus *must* be upon the supremacy of *no* race.

This requires the establishment of a political commons between those of different backgrounds.

On 'class separation', I take it that you mean that workers of different 'collars' must be separated, but again, that requires a sort of commons.

Any segregation *must* be transitional, since Communists demand the democratisation of all.

We seek to build a world where what we do is not dictated by markets or anything else which, as an organising force, is at least partially reliant on our unconscious actions.

There is absolutely nothing that unites workers besides their inclusion in the social order, as it happens.

What you're proposing is more of the same bullshit fucking identity politics which has plagued Communism, while Communists seek to use this commons of having little or no control over the social order despite being dependent on wage labour.

```You dont know what morality means right. If you do something you dont want done to yourself you are breaking morality. There is no grey zone, If you think there is current order bs, something is moral or it is not```