That is true

" I cannot threaten you in the sense that I'll come round to your home and sock the shit out of you, since I am not in any place to do so," no shit you are aincel

@Borzo rusely interupting because of damage control, lol

Ok """"free thinker""""

", nor do I consider it my goal." no you want communism to stomp me , instead of doing it yourself. Which is why you like communism,, you think this will results in other ppl carrying your load

"Death to Nature; this is the age of people and consciousness."

wtf

Yes that's exactly why I like communism

That's why communists like communism too

A lot of ppl like it because of that

they are cattle

and like that they dont have to take their own responisbility

>you think communism results in other ppl carrying your load
That's capitalism

"Ok """"free thinker"""" " Yeah this is the opposite from conformism

Getting other people to work for you

No one carries your load in capitalism

you have to engineer everything yourself

capitalism is not having other carry your load, it is expoiting others

Lmao what

in communism whith no class you have other more productive workers carry your load

Making others work for you while you don't work at all is pure capitalism

this is so calming to some incels

it is expoitation, as it goes beyond just carrying a load

nuance

Which is worse

jesus fuck

did i say it wasnt

And so how do you get people to carry your load for you in communism?

im pointing out the nuance, you think that capitalism is carrying some one elses load, it isnt as it isnt just the load tyou are carrying, its is more then just the load that is gained by the one who exploits

the exploiter gets more then just a load

so what you said is wrong, as it lacks that nuance

The exploiter gains your whole load, but gives you a slither back as a wage

"nd so how do you get people to carry your load for you in communism?" by being a unproductive worker, you still get all the benifits but some one else is working harder

how ever what you get is only " a load "

No work, no food

No benefits

No luxuries

Simple as that

Only the "no food" thing in extreme circumstances

do you get that the load is means of existance, beyond the load which is the expoitation part is luxeries

But otherwise just no benefits