this is just gone get good as you are starting to loop

Because, again, you haven't added anything new.

i already showed you the reasons why government is against teh principle

You're repeating shit that's been debunked. I'm asking you to prove that anarchists don't want rules.

and you asked for it again

it is you who is looping with the same arguments

Using a Wikipedia page which didn't have what you said it would have in it?

i just give you the simple rebut and awnbsers that you keep ignoring

That last line is your mental break or something?

Your page didn't come up with what you were hoping for.

You state a absense of evidence double negative

You said 'anarchists don't want rules'. That page did not say that at all.

lol

Now you are coming up with my page?> what page,. what are you even revering to

which part of the page

But you never proved that they don't want a state.

And you were the one who was bringing up Wikipedia in the first place.

lol

So if it's not there, then why even bother with it?

I'm referring to the whole page.

i just proved the reason why they did not want a state with your wiki

and now you already forggoten it

You did not make a proof at all.

yes i did, ""Lets use your link from wiki "A widely-used definition is a state being a polity that, within a given territory, maintains a monopoly on the use of force,""

being under a monopoly by force is not the anarcist way

That does not mean that 'making rules' is statist.

The point is that one would be able to go and choose someone else's rules.

That's what the anarchists want.

What are you even talking about

it isnt even relevant as it also states that a state is a polity

You don't have to have a state to make socially-enforced rules at all.

a anarchist does not wants to be in a polity

You dont know what words mean yet you claim to read books

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polity

Where did it say on the anarchism page that they don't want to be in their own polity?

"Anarchism is an anti-authoritarian political philosophy[1] that rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. These institutions are often described as stateless societies,[2] although several authors have defined them more specifically as distinct institutions based on non-hierarchical or free associations.[3] Anarchism's central disagreement with other ideologies is that it holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.[4]"

>self-managed

>self-governed

the absense of evidence is not counter evidence itself

your line of reasonong is retard

It's not just a case of the anarchism page falling silent on the matter.