But you never proved that they don't want a state.

And you were the one who was bringing up Wikipedia in the first place.

lol

So if it's not there, then why even bother with it?

I'm referring to the whole page.

i just proved the reason why they did not want a state with your wiki

and now you already forggoten it

You did not make a proof at all.

yes i did, ""Lets use your link from wiki "A widely-used definition is a state being a polity that, within a given territory, maintains a monopoly on the use of force,""

being under a monopoly by force is not the anarcist way

That does not mean that 'making rules' is statist.

The point is that one would be able to go and choose someone else's rules.

That's what the anarchists want.

What are you even talking about

it isnt even relevant as it also states that a state is a polity

You don't have to have a state to make socially-enforced rules at all.

a anarchist does not wants to be in a polity

You dont know what words mean yet you claim to read books

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polity

Where did it say on the anarchism page that they don't want to be in their own polity?

"Anarchism is an anti-authoritarian political philosophy[1] that rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. These institutions are often described as stateless societies,[2] although several authors have defined them more specifically as distinct institutions based on non-hierarchical or free associations.[3] Anarchism's central disagreement with other ideologies is that it holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.[4]"

>self-managed

>self-governed

the absense of evidence is not counter evidence itself

your line of reasonong is retard

It's not just a case of the anarchism page falling silent on the matter.

Does a anarcist wants to be in a heiracy?

It's saying that you're wrong.

>government = hierarchy

dont side track in to governments

does a anarcist wants a hieracy?

No, I can go one better. It said 'unjust hierarchies'.

**...such as those which are not imposed by force upon people!**

Oke, source ,

And he calls me the amnesiac.

"Anarchism is an anti-authoritarian political philosophy[1] that rejects hierarchies deemed unjust and advocates their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions. These institutions are often described as stateless societies,[2] although several authors have defined them more specifically as distinct institutions based on non-hierarchical or free associations.[3] Anarchism's central disagreement with other ideologies is that it holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.[4]"

>**hierarchies deemed unjust**

>that rejects hierarchies
>and advocates their replacement with self-managed, self-governed societies based on voluntary, cooperative institutions.

So that is not gorenment

*unjust hierarchies*