Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 594257656206852146
Look at you changing the topic.
on the website
Yes, it doesn't say that.
No im not changing topics at all
im nearly point oput that that set of behaviour fuits you
im not intending at all to change subject
You just did.
this is just gone get good as you are starting to loop
Because, again, you haven't added anything new.
i already showed you the reasons why government is against teh principle
You're repeating shit that's been debunked. I'm asking you to prove that anarchists don't want rules.
and you asked for it again
it is you who is looping with the same arguments
Using a Wikipedia page which didn't have what you said it would have in it?
i just give you the simple rebut and awnbsers that you keep ignoring
That last line is your mental break or something?
Your page didn't come up with what you were hoping for.
You state a absense of evidence double negative
You said 'anarchists don't want rules'. That page did not say that at all.
lol
which part of the page
But you never proved that they don't want a state.
And you were the one who was bringing up Wikipedia in the first place.
lol
So if it's not there, then why even bother with it?
I'm referring to the whole page.
i just proved the reason why they did not want a state with your wiki
and now you already forggoten it
You did not make a proof at all.
yes i did, ""Lets use your link from wiki "A widely-used definition is a state being a polity that, within a given territory, maintains a monopoly on the use of force,""
being under a monopoly by force is not the anarcist way
That does not mean that 'making rules' is statist.
The point is that one would be able to go and choose someone else's rules.
That's what the anarchists want.
What are you even talking about
it isnt even relevant as it also states that a state is a polity
You don't have to have a state to make socially-enforced rules at all.
a anarchist does not wants to be in a polity
You dont know what words mean yet you claim to read books