That's what I said.
There are two reasons why, at any present moment, there compromises to be made.
One is due to resource shortages, but this can be dealt with through expanding the amount of resources available.
yes and that means that you are not free to do what ever you want
and no that is not out of context
you keep saying that because it is inconviniant fior you
You cant stop comprimising , this is not just a moment
and again there are no comprimisies
its work or gulag
Oh, you didn't get what I meant by 'compromise', Mr Nuance.
You ant expand resources btw
resources are finite
lol
i know what the word comprimise means. do you ?
Yes, American, I don't doubt you there, but what you have described is a compromise. Notice how you've changed the subject again from freedom to compromises.
lol at that bias and assumprion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise
What i have described is a comprimise"
what did i descibe
so vague
Going to a gulag is a deal, no?
One could further resist and end up getting the wall.
It's just that the compromise is highly asymmetric.
You yourself said that communist wil stomp me
so that isnt really compromising is it
The big authoritarian state gives up whatever use it might get out of the poor fellow who's getting gulaged too...
Both sides do lose out, though one can afford to make up for it more than the other.
That's a compromise.
you cant not be communisny, you have to conform and submit.. by your words
Two conflicting interests. Both don't get what they ultimately want.
that isnt comprimising
Why not?
Again, the state loses out too!
Would the state rather that the dissenter didn't dissent?
you cant not be communist, you have to conform and submit.. by your words
this is not comprimising
you have to work to the collective goel
Read the definition I gave you.
there is no comprimise
history of communism also show and support the no comprimise thing
'The collective will allow you to live while you support the collective. If not, we lose you, but you lose your life.'
