Yes, but history *prior* to today and today.

Not tomorrow.

now you start talking about political comprimises to digress again 😄

Then I should be more clear, Mr Nuance.

Do you agree that people only have disputes because of a lack of means to fulfil goals which come into conflict?

you assume my assumtion

andare you really saying that there are comprimises in communism

You use so many words without saying a single thing

You took that out of context again. There will always be compromises; freedom does not come all at once. It's a question of whether we deal with those compromises and eliminate the need to conform to them or whether we respect them.

That's what I said.

There are two reasons why, at any present moment, there compromises to be made.

One is due to resource shortages, but this can be dealt with through expanding the amount of resources available.

yes and that means that you are not free to do what ever you want

and no that is not out of context

you keep saying that because it is inconviniant fior you

You cant stop comprimising , this is not just a moment

and again there are no comprimisies

its work or gulag

Oh, you didn't get what I meant by 'compromise', Mr Nuance.

You ant expand resources btw

resources are finite

lol

i know what the word comprimise means. do you ?

Yes, American, I don't doubt you there, but what you have described is a compromise. Notice how you've changed the subject again from freedom to compromises.

lol at that bias and assumprion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise

What i have described is a comprimise"

what did i descibe

so vague

Going to a gulag is a deal, no?

One could further resist and end up getting the wall.

It's just that the compromise is highly asymmetric.

You yourself said that communist wil stomp me

so that isnt really compromising is it

The big authoritarian state gives up whatever use it might get out of the poor fellow who's getting gulaged too...

Both sides do lose out, though one can afford to make up for it more than the other.

That's a compromise.

you cant not be communisny, you have to conform and submit.. by your words

Two conflicting interests. Both don't get what they ultimately want.

that isnt comprimising