lol at that bias and assumprion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise

What i have described is a comprimise"

what did i descibe

so vague

Going to a gulag is a deal, no?

One could further resist and end up getting the wall.

It's just that the compromise is highly asymmetric.

You yourself said that communist wil stomp me

so that isnt really compromising is it

The big authoritarian state gives up whatever use it might get out of the poor fellow who's getting gulaged too...

Both sides do lose out, though one can afford to make up for it more than the other.

That's a compromise.

you cant not be communisny, you have to conform and submit.. by your words

Two conflicting interests. Both don't get what they ultimately want.

that isnt comprimising

Why not?

Again, the state loses out too!

Would the state rather that the dissenter didn't dissent?

you cant not be communist, you have to conform and submit.. by your words

this is not comprimising

you have to work to the collective goel

Read the definition I gave you.

there is no comprimise

history of communism also show and support the no comprimise thing

'The collective will allow you to live while you support the collective. If not, we lose you, but you lose your life.'

"the definition you gave me"

A deal.

as if you are the autority

Oh, and *you* were with everything else?

When Wikipedia said something you didn't agree with, you made shit up.

You extrapolated when it fell silent.

'muh absence'

and you imply that i dont know what comprimise is whan i point out several points wheer communism doesnt comprimises. WIth points you mentioned yourself

Again, Mr Nuance, that's a compromise.

It's a deal, even if it's a highly unfair one.

"When Wikipedia said something you didn't agree with, you made shit up."

i never disagreed with wiki

you imply and slander

Yes you did. 'muh anarchists don't like governance and governments'

...when it said nothing about governments on the 'anarchism' page.