So *this* was the centre of all that controversy, in light of everything that I had said prior to that.

complete avoidance about the days of avoidance you sputed on this shit saying you didnt said it

Oh, but by the way...

**I already got to this.**

Days of avoidance, he says, and I already beat him to it.

You say about doing what one fucking pleases. There is no nauace awith this 😄

Then you argue that doing what one fucking pleases is not fre or freedom

fucking hilarious m8

Yes there is, Mr Nuance. If you were a Communist, you'd understand that Communists don't deal with frozen absolutes like this.

Also, that's not what I'm gonna argue.

And here is the nuance , you are not free to do what ever you "fucking" want

as you need to submit 😄

Nuance? That's an attempt at a counterargument.

liek fopr days you are talking about this backpeddaling

using teh word nuance is a joust

>you don't understand what I meant

<why are you using the word 'nuance'

Be consistent.

Its pretty clear when you say " doing what you fucking want"

like i said theer is little nuance ther m8

Wrong again, because what one 'fucking wants' is itself a historical thing, it is in motion, it's not an absolute.

aa

it kinda is

i mean you even added the "fucking " in there

>no nuance

pretty dertemative words

>oh, but here's determinative nuance!

*Consistency.*

o reall

enlighten us

where is the nuance when you say to do what one fucking wants

i think thats pretty absolute

And you're assuming what I mean.

there are butss>

Again, I mean that it's a provisional thing.

then you are not doing what ever you fucking want

What one wants is a historical thing...

what is this historical thing you keep mentiong

It's about getting there, and then discovering that there's more, and getting further ad infinitum.

Maybe it's called... the movement of the social world itself.