To do that, they must always be changing, abolishing their past selves.

Interests must be made to constructively overlap rather than to conflict without destroying their key elements.

Now I think you make more sense than @Deleted User

Argument is flawless

And these interests themselves must be revised and strengthened constantly.

But before who?

@Deleted User of who is garbage?

Before as many who stand to have their livelihoods changed as possible.

All stakeholders involved must contribute and benefit too.

Communism is about militant advancement and an infinitely-expanding base of freedoms.

@Garbage what political parties do you support?

I do not support any in particular besides for critical and tactical purposes, and this is besides the point.

I might say more on that later.

Anyway, the point is that focussing on abstract freedoms and submissions is a false question, because it's obvious that ultimately, of course a most abstract 'submission' is unavoidable. The point is to abolish it.

It's not what Offender wants, though.

>he thinks I meant that Communism is where one can do what one fucking pleases all at once

>he thinks that I didn't mean that this was provisional

Okay it wasnt the word "free or freedom"

ow back pedals 😄

So *this* was the centre of all that controversy, in light of everything that I had said prior to that.

complete avoidance about the days of avoidance you sputed on this shit saying you didnt said it

Oh, but by the way...

**I already got to this.**

Days of avoidance, he says, and I already beat him to it.

You say about doing what one fucking pleases. There is no nauace awith this 😄

Then you argue that doing what one fucking pleases is not fre or freedom

fucking hilarious m8

Yes there is, Mr Nuance. If you were a Communist, you'd understand that Communists don't deal with frozen absolutes like this.

Also, that's not what I'm gonna argue.

And here is the nuance , you are not free to do what ever you "fucking" want

as you need to submit 😄

Nuance? That's an attempt at a counterargument.

liek fopr days you are talking about this backpeddaling

using teh word nuance is a joust

>you don't understand what I meant

<why are you using the word 'nuance'

Be consistent.

Its pretty clear when you say " doing what you fucking want"

like i said theer is little nuance ther m8