But SD are capitalists?

@Arkras and you against revolutionary blood?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_communism

believing in morals doesn't make one an idealist but its a pretty good chance that any given moralist is a massive idealist

@ShadyMarxist I donnu, what u mean?

liberation theology?

@Arkras Tell me about communism you imagine.

moralists tend to think their perceptions of justice will ultimately prevail because of their political work, which is pretty textbook idealism

@ShadyMarxist A world with equal money, rights, freedom of religion, complete freedom of expression, a strong state and a lot of communes.

@ShadyMarxist I could write an essay about it, but I don't have time for that.

@Arkras I thought nobody crazier than Russian Orthodox Communist. But you guys have them too.

@ShadyMarxist are you saying that i'm crazy? But anyway I just want a strong state that protects the freedoms and right of the people.

@Arkras is it a sect within some religion?

@ShadyMarxist what are you refering to?

@Arkras your situation.

@ShadyMarxist Go read this: http://isj.org.uk/marxism-and-ethics/

or anyone really

We can never have a communist society without proper ethic grounding

Antihumanists could disagree

Althusserian people

@AngryChekist ethic grounding shall not be in a form of morality.

@ShadyMarxist I'm a freelancer, yes I belong to the Folkekirke (Peopleschurch), but I believe in what I want to.

@Arkras No offense here, but I think your conception of communism is influenced by bourgeois propaganda when saying that it's about a strong state and equal money

@ShadyMarxist what does that even mean

@Blebleh I don't think so. It is what I want, and it what the communists in Denmark strive for, so I really have no choice.

I understand that it could be used to electoral publicity

but first we make a distinction between socialism as first stage, and communism as the last stage. State conceived as the monopoly of violence and the organization of a class to oppress another

strong state would be in socialism, in the first phase, to make the dictatorship of the proletariat; that would mean the workers over the capitalists

in communism there wouldn't be capitalists and state would wither away

@Blebleh Please don't say that you are a Ancom 😫

this is from marxism-leninism

Well I just role with what suits me!

and also, in socialism the principle is "to each according to his contribution"

only the private means of productions, aka enterprises are owned publicly; the personal property is yours and there isn't equality of money

although the socialization of the means makes more equality of money

because capitalists, who have a lot of money are expropriated

planning and so on

For an exsample I want people to live between 2000 US to around 5000 US.

I can see that the workers must own there workplace, but I think we also need regulations about how much you can make, and how much you minimum can make, because else we will get class division.

technically we can't get class division because the means are already owned by the workers and there's no market; but there could be parasitism between the same workers

I agree with you in this