Message from @Arbuz Volk (арбуз волк)
Discord ID: 347815814662979595
why would i embrace a system that when handed everything ti could have wanted failed repeatedly?
and no, socialism never got the class concouse working prolitariat it wanted.
>ignoring constant american invasions of socialist countries
>ignoring coups backed by the USA in socialist countries
>ignoring sanctions which isolated socialist states
Read a book faggot.
1) Fascism/Monarchism is a system that has repeatedly failed every time ti has been attempted becouse one person cannot possibly be expected to know everything nessesary to manage a wide area of porduction. 2) antifa is a gang of semiliterate hipsters who think punching people make them look kool. ANd by hipster i mean anyone who is more interested in personal statuse then coherant social revolution. If you do not have a celar understanding of how you are reorganizing production on the day after the revolution, your revolution has already failed
^ T H I S
Antifa should be shooting the fash
you only read the first sentance didn't you...
Better than Nazis <:merchant:323550879749898242>
in order to succeed, a revolution need one of two things, Broad based public support, or borad based publicappathy. Shooting people in the streets gets us neither
Antifa is still the best hope for America
Civil war when?
Arm the workers, and the poor. Unite the Left and take back America for the working class
Yes!
international brigades when?
lololololol
We should bomb white house
do trump tower
Get Muslims to do it
Im not a member of the inferior race
@Arbuz Volk (арбуз волк) Why is Antifa the best hope for America.
@Arbuz Volk (арбуз волк) >Antifa doing gods work
That is implying that you guys believe in a god.
@Rendghast >Monarchism
>Failed
The UK, germany, prussia, austria, greece, etc would disagree with you.
the only one of those to still have a monarchy is the UK, and it has all the decision making power of a gerbel
But because the systems eventually faded away does not mean they were failures, if we used that argument to say that a system has failed, then communism and socialism would have been labeled as failures as well.
The monarchs in the UK can always restore the power of the king and queen, whether the population would be accepting however, is another issue entirely.
already delt with that. COmmunim never got the class concouse prolitariat it needed, Monarchism had literally every condition immaginable and still failed....and you just argued my point, a system that lacks public support is a failed system, go read locke again please
Yet if it never got the class concouse prlitariat then dosen't that mean in it self it was a failed system?
And about monarchism, it wiped itself out through the course of many great wars, revolutions, and more, the remneants of it are in africa and the middle east, where the saud's control most of the worlds oil supplies, and the african kings rule with an iron fist in their unstable and death ridden countries.
The only thing keeping people back from supporing monarchism is fear of their governments becoming tryanical and oppressive.
yes, just becouse you do not have a set of wrenches means you have no clue how to repair a car....oh, wait
have you looked at saudi arabia? the have paramilitary malicias killing people in the streets for questioning the state religeon...that no success, thats despratly staving off total collapse
True, but it is like I mentioned, remneants.
the only thing keeping people from supporting monarchism is the actions of every monarchy in history, all of which where inevitably tyranical and repressive
They are a shell of their former colony days when they were mostly dependant on the european powers for support.