in order to succeed, a revolution need one of two things, Broad based public support, or borad based publicappathy. Shooting people in the streets gets us neither

Antifa is still the best hope for America

Civil war when?

Arm the workers, and the poor. Unite the Left and take back America for the working class

Yes!

international brigades when?

lololololol

We should bomb white house

do trump tower

Why not both?

Get Muslims to do it

@Vladislav

Im not a member of the inferior race

@Arbuz Volk (арбуз волк) Why is Antifa the best hope for America.

@Arbuz Volk (арбуз волк) >Antifa doing gods work
That is implying that you guys believe in a god.

@Rendghast >Monarchism
>Failed
The UK, germany, prussia, austria, greece, etc would disagree with you.

the only one of those to still have a monarchy is the UK, and it has all the decision making power of a gerbel

But because the systems eventually faded away does not mean they were failures, if we used that argument to say that a system has failed, then communism and socialism would have been labeled as failures as well.

The monarchs in the UK can always restore the power of the king and queen, whether the population would be accepting however, is another issue entirely.

already delt with that. COmmunim never got the class concouse prolitariat it needed, Monarchism had literally every condition immaginable and still failed....and you just argued my point, a system that lacks public support is a failed system, go read locke again please

Yet if it never got the class concouse prlitariat then dosen't that mean in it self it was a failed system?

And about monarchism, it wiped itself out through the course of many great wars, revolutions, and more, the remneants of it are in africa and the middle east, where the saud's control most of the worlds oil supplies, and the african kings rule with an iron fist in their unstable and death ridden countries.

The only thing keeping people back from supporing monarchism is fear of their governments becoming tryanical and oppressive.

yes, just becouse you do not have a set of wrenches means you have no clue how to repair a car....oh, wait

have you looked at saudi arabia? the have paramilitary malicias killing people in the streets for questioning the state religeon...that no success, thats despratly staving off total collapse

True, but it is like I mentioned, remneants.

the only thing keeping people from supporting monarchism is the actions of every monarchy in history, all of which where inevitably tyranical and repressive

They are a shell of their former colony days when they were mostly dependant on the european powers for support.

what was the quote from the hapsburgs, "you can do everything with a bayonet, except sit on it"

Not true when you look at the history of the UK, Austria-Hungary, Prussia, and more, which were crushed in times of war, or their systems gradually changed and the power of the monarchs were either lost or were neutered.

i have read the history of austria hungry

congrats

it was acobbled together mess of nationalities that was perpetually on the edge of revolution and requiered violent suppresions every few years to keep it in one piece

prussia was cohesive only becouse it was tiny, germany was a monarchy of all of what, 50 years

and the british executed more then a couple of their kings before diciding that maybe kings where not the best idea to begin with

i am trying to dicide if you are trolling or just have not read any european hisotry

Though you have to note, that their ends were not *ULTIMATELY* from the way they treated their peoples.

pretty much yeah, they where

hapsburgs lost ww1 becouse their army could have cared less if they won or not. Charles got it for being a nutter. WIlhelm same reason