Message from @Lucas 4313

Discord ID: 417178024530673666


2018-02-25 04:31:29 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 No, the UK and france pulled support, and later actually supported the USSR, towards the end of the war.

2018-02-25 04:31:32 UTC  

marx and engels trying to justify the preservation of the state is exactly the reason for the atrocities committed by the ussr, the dprk, and venezuela.
it is for this exact reason that i will hate marx and engels forever

2018-02-25 04:32:02 UTC  

@alines To be fair, marx and engels did state that later on the state would dissolve by it's self.

2018-02-25 04:32:30 UTC  

you cannot just dissolve a state in this world

2018-02-25 04:32:36 UTC  

you will lose to outside forces

2018-02-25 04:32:40 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 Pol pot tried it.

2018-02-25 04:32:46 UTC  

pol pot failed

2018-02-25 04:32:59 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 He got taken out by his former comrades.

2018-02-25 04:33:20 UTC  

bakunin said "no it wouldn't dissolve itself" and not once has that happened in cases for socialism in which the state was conquered

2018-02-25 04:33:33 UTC  

rather than annihilated

2018-02-25 04:33:54 UTC  

@alines Indeed, marxist ideals really do not hold up.

2018-02-25 04:34:04 UTC  

Rex whos side are you on

2018-02-25 04:34:05 UTC  

what are you

2018-02-25 04:34:14 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 I'm a nazi.

2018-02-25 04:34:20 UTC  

oh right

2018-02-25 04:34:21 UTC  

he's anti-marxist, as a nazi

2018-02-25 04:34:22 UTC  

anyway

2018-02-25 04:35:04 UTC  

the state cannot dissolve unless the former state takes undeniable precedence over the world

2018-02-25 04:35:29 UTC  

@alines The issue with non marxist and anti marxist leftist beliefs, is that most of the time, they do not get far at all.

2018-02-25 04:35:50 UTC  

would it still? even in that case, when the state has conquered the whole world? i doubt it

2018-02-25 04:36:31 UTC  

we'll cross that bridge when we get there

2018-02-25 04:36:36 UTC  

we havent even come close

2018-02-25 04:37:17 UTC  

I mean, when you centralize the world, and everybody becomes dependant on a single state, there is no real reason to just say "OKAY, ANARCHY FOR ALL, FUCK STABILITY AND ALL THE PROGRESS WE HAVE MADE.".

2018-02-25 04:37:39 UTC  

thats....

2018-02-25 04:37:41 UTC  

not how it works

2018-02-25 04:37:45 UTC  

its not anarchy

2018-02-25 04:38:05 UTC  

i think the worst thing that could happen in a world-wide red bureaucracy is that it would deny its own existence

2018-02-25 04:38:28 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 Stateless society with no centralized form of power? That's anarchy in it's pure definition my man.

2018-02-25 04:38:36 UTC  

while still existing

2018-02-25 04:38:59 UTC  

@alines That's akin to trotsky's beliefs.

2018-02-25 04:39:18 UTC  

so if anarchy is the end goal, why jump through all these superviolent hoops?

2018-02-25 04:39:19 UTC  

the way I see it there is extremely small centralized government while the rest lives in what appears to be a state in perfect unison

2018-02-25 04:39:55 UTC  

@Lucas 4313 The way YOU see it? So much for being a marxist.

2018-02-25 04:40:04 UTC  

>small
>centralized
PICK ONE

2018-02-25 04:40:44 UTC  

you know theres local and central government, and they coexist literally everywhere

2018-02-25 04:40:56 UTC  

but the end goal is left to broad terms in most of marx's works

2018-02-25 04:40:58 UTC  
2018-02-25 04:41:17 UTC  

f e d e r a l

2018-02-25 04:41:45 UTC  

Yhea, the state is not exactly a local government, it is a regional government.

2018-02-25 04:42:19 UTC  

thats practically the same

2018-02-25 04:42:30 UTC  

No it isn't.