I get the isolation point you have in the enslavement part. But it's exactly the inversely the same in the case of collectivism

The tyranny of the Majority

heard of it

Why we had constitutions in the first place.

Give everyone control, and no one has it.

Only the ideologue

the demagogue

```It's not always greedy and poor you know. Ever thought of production and the work. If some produces more how the hell is he greedy. Also the shareholders, willing consumers and not to mention your compliance in the benefits yet never the loss or the cost. how do you explain that.```

A willing consumer only cares for the product and not the products manufacturing or untold suffering. We both seem to be speaking from a middle class perspective that we to a limited degree think the class here is fading in the USA. The poor deserve more say and control then they are granted by the ivory tower worshippers and the man beyond.

```If it's convoluted how would you explain your perfect Communist system, in which Marx proposed all existing social conditions be eradicated, as a very bold claim. Without any road map, on what you may do, and certainly no end either. As you never made it up anyway.```

I don't believe in perfection because humans aren't ever to achieve it. The Overman proves this and humanity can't even achieve it. Marx wanted their lands and worshippers wiped out, not the fact they existed, he was after all an historian. There is a road map, its the matter of getting there that Leftists agree to commit to in the end, they all agree where they must go but never how to get there

Big Brother and the party

How they amass that power you ignore

The party is too be destroyed as well

Oh well, I guess will stop arguing, I do like what you propose, but just want the results in the right way. Not end up in a new form of tyranny.
Right now my concern is with tech and how much control it has on our lives. The capitalist as you might coin him has more control than he could ever dream before. How to stop this giant monster, I have no clue and it's keeps getting bigger and bigger.

heehheheehheeh

good

the primmie path is one of insanity

but its the best one for you lmfao

Unabomber time

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

@Prometheus

Will give it a read, thanks

I wish I was better with Prim Theory but im more focused on the praxis of it

@Cúchulainn slave

post your shit

he has more pdfs than I do

Europa über alles

I've my share of .pdfs because I used to have a kink for collecting them, but I'm exhausted lads spare me

Shut the fuck up faggot @hans the homofascist

https://youtu.be/8EujVCe_vYg

nice

@Cúchulainn shut up subhuman

@hans the homofascist ok cope

says the human parasite

Copelets

A question for all people who want to answer.

Can War be avoided? Don't todays wars feel different from the past. We are sent to Wars and somehow conscripted to it without being fully consciously aware in what we are taking part in.

We are pulled into stuff, without knowing what interests are of the people who pushed us in it. It can be the same for both sides who are waging war even.

If somehow we knew what it was all about would we be able to stop these major wars between countries?
Or I mean silent wars of today. Unlike a full fledged announced wars of the past.

Sob no one cares. I guess it was too much a packaged question and a hypothetical one too.

I didn't see it

one moment @Prometheus

thanks for complying

```Can War be avoided```

Not in today's society, perputal war is the perfect way to keep the masses in line, even after revolution there is only conflict and more conflict arising again and again in an attempt to keep the fight going despite all the issues and failures that each "group" might face. Humanity will literally have to wiped out by an asteroid just so that they will stop killing each other for 2 milliseconds

I see, that's a pretty grim scenario. You are right I agree.