Message from @☭ Anon ☭

Discord ID: 589665050214662144


2019-06-16 03:42:53 UTC  

other anarchists are not

2019-06-16 03:43:10 UTC  

Before I say anything, I can't speak for every anarchist, and I'm not very academic, so take that how you will. But I believe the state exists to enforce hierarchies

2019-06-16 03:43:34 UTC  

Well can you elaborate on that

2019-06-16 03:44:29 UTC  

state bad

2019-06-16 03:44:54 UTC  

Like, hierarchies depend on there being more people on the bottom, and those people would be able to rise up if the state didn't have a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence

2019-06-16 03:47:19 UTC  

You wouldn’t be wrong in saying that the state is oppressive. Are you familiar with the ML idea of how the state forms

2019-06-16 03:47:29 UTC  

also sorry for slow typing

2019-06-16 03:47:33 UTC  

Im on a small ass phone

2019-06-16 03:47:41 UTC  

From 2013 lol

2019-06-16 03:48:23 UTC  

You good, and not really

2019-06-16 03:48:51 UTC  

Something about coming from feudalism or whatever

2019-06-16 03:49:00 UTC  

Basically we see the state apparatus as a tool of class rule. The dominant class uses it to oppress another

2019-06-16 03:50:06 UTC  

It forms because of the antagonistic contradictions between the proles and the bourgeoisie

2019-06-16 03:50:45 UTC  

We agree so far, ĉu ne?

2019-06-16 03:53:37 UTC  

We want to use the state apparatus as a tool of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, and remaining reactionary elements of society. If you agree that the state forms from class antagonisms, it only logically follows that the state would wither away as class does

2019-06-16 03:53:46 UTC  

What are your primary objections to this method of transitioning to communism

2019-06-16 03:55:33 UTC  

I'm not against this method per se, but I doubt the the state would wither away on its own, I think it would be too easy for new hierarchies to form using it

2019-06-16 03:56:10 UTC  

So you believe it is prone to devolving into red bureaucracy

2019-06-16 03:56:21 UTC  

?

2019-06-16 03:57:06 UTC  

Yeah,

2019-06-16 03:58:23 UTC  

well that can be avoided if the state is subservient to the masses

2019-06-16 03:58:34 UTC  

this can be accomplished through soviet democracy

2019-06-16 03:59:13 UTC  

How do you make a state truly subservient though?

2019-06-16 04:00:07 UTC  

Imperative mandate

2019-06-16 04:02:24 UTC  

basically if you make the peoples representatives accountable to the people then the chances of a bureaucracy forming are minimized

2019-06-16 04:02:59 UTC  

I mean if I’m wrong please correct me, but it makes sense to me

2019-06-16 04:05:25 UTC  

You're not wrong, I just think that people's interests are better served in other ways.

2019-06-16 04:05:56 UTC  

Also, how do you plan to gain control of the state

2019-06-16 04:06:01 UTC  

?

2019-06-16 04:06:34 UTC  

Are you talking about reformism?

2019-06-16 04:07:32 UTC  

If so, MLs believe the bourgeois state has to be completely destroyed

2019-06-16 04:07:47 UTC  

You say you want the proletariat to use the state as a tool against the bourgeoisie, but how would that happen?

2019-06-16 04:09:01 UTC  

Overthrow the bourgeoisie —> establish socialism with the vanguard party

2019-06-16 04:10:23 UTC  

The vanguard party is a weird concept to me, is it one of those things I have to read the books to understand

2019-06-16 04:10:32 UTC  

oatmeal

2019-06-16 04:10:40 UTC  

Yea pretty much

2019-06-16 04:10:54 UTC  

see anon gets it

2019-06-16 04:11:12 UTC  

I have a pdf collection of books and shit if you’d like to read something

2019-06-16 04:11:26 UTC  

you commies and your splinter groups

2019-06-16 04:11:41 UTC  

state and revolution is what I’d recommend for understanding ML ideas

2019-06-16 04:11:52 UTC  

and What is to be done