Not 2nd or anything but a small village marrying into itself was most likely common

We also have lots of blue eyed people in the family😂

There is if you do it for enough generations. One or two times it's unlikely to cause problems but eventually any recessive traits where you can be a carrier and have no problems but over time will have a larger and larger chance of a child getting both copies. There are many recessive trait disorders that we rarely see only because of the likelihood of getting both recessive copies. Some example of these diseases are sickle cell, cystic fibrosis, Gaucher disease. However there are other traits like eye color that are recessive that can become common in family lines with inbreading.

If not biological issues, then what else would make incest immoral?

Even religion has to give a reason for their claims

If I may, also, 99% of abortions are completely unrelated to r*pe, insest, and medical reasons, and even in those cases it’s proven time after time to cause a secondary trauma that often victims find worse and more damaging than the initial act, as a child (though it is largely romanticized in fiction) is used as a channel for healing and recuperation. Not surprising the left always fights for the <1% of everything, though.

Another thing I find I keep coming back to, if we normalize the celebration and start hating mourning for abortions, it’s just really a taste of not morning miscarriages, children, humanity as a whole, and as we can see by Cuomo and the near 7000 elderly, as well as the 30,000 Black alone abortions monthly, we’re already treading on such dangerous territory- one in which the literal foundation of our instincts and life is threatened.

Ok, for any who see my poll. I have a point to prove to my liberal co worker. @ me if you would like to discuss my poll with me

Btw, my objective is to prove that conservatives aren’t transphobic like the left says you guys are but you disagree on how we should treat our trans people. The left glorifies them, the right treats them like people and expects them to deal with their own issues, to grow up, and to do something about it.

I mean... it depends on@who was running as the opposition

Lol I’m joking

Maybe I’d vote for the person

Well, she would be right leaning platform knowing I am talking to conservatives here.

So opposition would be democratic

Make your pick

I’m not transphobic

But if they’re pronouns are kitty or panda I might change my mind

A normal tranny( like me) wants she/her. Or a trans man would prefer he/him. It is really that simple

Your transgender?

Yes, kinda why I am the tranny here

But I am reasonable and up for debate.

I didn’t even notice

Also if you disagree, I would love to know why

A damn cactus could run for president and if it was america first I'd still vote for it.

Lol

President Cactus, what must we do about the situation of the invaders? “No mercy, use our thorns.”

Someone with gender disphoria is not mentally fit to run for president. Change my mind

I have sympathy for them, and think they are capable people, but not ones that can run America

At least you can defend your viewpoint. Not a bad take.

But I see where you are coming from, it does make sense.

Still more stable than Democrats

Now that, we can agree on

But i give you this question? What if they were stable enough hypothetically?

I really like this take.

What if they took a mental acuity test, was certified by a well known by reputable psychologist and they are plenty fit to be president.

It would depend on the person, I’d have to see it. But I’m definitely skeptical. If I didn’t vote for them, it would be based off of a policy position, not them personally. Their trans stance would just be the position. Irregardless of if they switched or not, it’s a position I disagree with.

I would make my own opinions and not just go off the doctors. If this year has taught me one thing, it’s to not trust the “experts” at face value

True

I would vote based on policies and if they are fit to be president, If I know they are good, then I see no problem.

Gender or race shouldn’t matter this much, I don’t care if the President is a cactus, only can you do the job well or not.

If someone came and wanted to run, but was a practicing homosexual, I would be skeptical in the same way, because it is wrong. (I’m a Christian). If they were a former homosexual, then different story, but I don’t want a president who exemplifies sinful behavior.

I think a person can have good policy positions but not be qualified for president