Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 787179959457677323
for me it's more of a practical thing, how patents slow down innovation
businesses still want to improve, and innovation is a highly collaborative process
lgbt is a spook
I don't see the point of patents
Seems to get in the way of progress
i mean it makes sense on a face value, like if someone can't recoup their costs they won't innovate
and we gonna be stuck with everything being the same, which i mean
or slower rate of innovation rather
Why would you want to invent if you didn't have a piece of paper saying nobody can use ur invention without your permission first so that you can profit from it?
because businesses compete, and it's not like inventions are made with just one person, they are built on previous work and when someone monopolies it means further derivative work can't be done as quickly
but on the rights issue, it's not like genuine property
like if you own a car you own it forever, what's the deal with having patents for just 5 - 10 years
why not for a life with ability to transfer to your children
U don't get my point
just be a right leaning egoist
though my main thing with is it overall rate of innovation, that patents actually slow down it
Do you think Star Wars would have been a thing if Lucas didn't know he could profit from it
Do you think lightbulbs would be a thing if Edison couldn't profit from them
Do you think TNT would be a thing if Nobel couldn't profit from it?
Nah,they would go work in some giant firm and waste their potential
Especially inventors
that's a utalitarian argument, and in regards to that, it removes a lot of the derivative work, i mean it's like saying do you think research would be done without government research
plus before edison there were a bunch of light bulb prototypes
Yeah research would be without government research
It is
edison is a good poster child of dubiousness of IP actually
without government subsidies to farmers we will all starve
dur dur, see a couple of good things a less efficient policy did, that justifies it over a more efficient one
Government research is gay
it does occasionally pop out good stuff, it just costs a lot and private research delivers results faster
Yeah but private research would cost less and deliver more
the public research on aliens have gone well
fucking obama
it's in the self interest of the company with or without IP, without IP you just don't have the same government imposing a cost in expenses for a patent bureau and their bureaucracy
probably a consequence of abolishing patents is faster rate of smaller innovation
and less larger companies
Lmao,its more about the art industry really
But scientists who discover something deserve to profit from it too
deserve, what's next quoting carl marx, you are a wage slave heh jk
the people that spam the wagies meme are bottom of the barrel faggots
Its litteraly there to incentivize inovation lmao
Yes