Message from @Semaj
Discord ID: 795460745882107946
Im not referring tl that
If america today went wignat for example
Why shouldnt it put blacks in camps?
Why should it not enslave them
Im not talking about going to other continents strictly to enslave
are they more efficient than machines? you need to feed them and treat them fairly decently. what value is there in doing that? what exactly is it you're having them doing?
They'll be living in mud huts or shacks cramped together and they'll eat porridge or watered down soup for meals most of the time, not to mention that the weak/old ones will be disposed of once they become liabilities
Moving boxes, being in production lines(like the jews in nazi germany), in mines, etc
The point isnt long term labor anyway, its to windle down their numbers while putting them to some use
slavery isnt profitable lol
Here, see this kinds of people
smaller consumer base
"muh wealth of nations"
You spend little on them and get a large workforce
Is genocide better?
why is wealth something to not like?
Its a book
i know but im saying
the gist of it is wealth right?
and how nations should acquire as much as possible?
Also u can make them work without consuming much, thats good, not bad
malnourished african hard labour hmmm
This is good, u consume what they dont
As if it were a bad thing
id say the purpose of forced labor more so is to dwindle down their numbers while making some use of them - it may not be profitable short term but if theyre eradicated long term you can move in your own people and develop it like that
@Punished Nazberg to make a slave the most profitable to work you need to feed, house, and aid a slave
How is it not profitable
im not saying it ISNT
its gonna cost more anyways unless the slaves are largely disposable
im sayign EVEN i we assume it is
I've already stated how easy/cheap that will be to do
He produces more
Ffs with this kind of thought the world is a deficit
It clearly is not
Or we would be living like monkeys