Message from @bress222

Discord ID: 463457416751874048


2018-07-02 20:57:27 UTC  

We did Battle of the Nile in school

2018-07-02 20:58:17 UTC  

In my school we spent almost a week on andrew jackson

2018-07-02 20:58:19 UTC  

<:dab:402362224527671306>

2018-07-02 20:58:25 UTC  

even watched a video

2018-07-02 20:58:59 UTC  

No chads like that in our school

2018-07-02 20:59:10 UTC  

We learnt of Chad Charles I

2018-07-02 20:59:45 UTC  

But only in the context of OH MUH GAWD HE SHUT DOWN DEMOCRACY IM SO GLAD HE WAS BEHEADED

2018-07-02 21:00:35 UTC  

Under his personal rule England made peace with France and Spain, increased royal income etc

2018-07-02 21:18:17 UTC  

@Solipsistic Vinarchy who is this wired sources? seen everyone RTing them only recently

2018-07-02 21:27:46 UTC  

People saying Barret most likely seems great

2018-07-02 21:28:14 UTC  

Immigration hawk, big white family and very Christian

2018-07-02 21:29:36 UTC  

would be a big win but unfortunately she is a woman

2018-07-02 21:29:44 UTC  

meta i have dumb question for you on how supreme court works

2018-07-02 21:31:11 UTC  

Also she’s got a black adopted kid

2018-07-02 21:31:16 UTC  

What’s the Q

2018-07-02 21:32:10 UTC  

so supreme court doesn’t really get to organically choose to over turn abortion rights obviously. but they pick and choose from a list of thousands of cases before them. so how can we be so sure roe v wade gets over turned with new justice?

2018-07-02 21:33:14 UTC  

Well we can’t exactly. So say a state challenges the law, this would go to SC potentially here they could say the states now decide on abortion

2018-07-02 21:33:43 UTC  

Then you could get states to ban it individually don’t know how many would do that tho

2018-07-02 21:34:18 UTC  

okay so they don’t necessarily have to wait for a case pertaining to abortion to come across their desk then make a ruling that’s broad enough to give states that option, a state can challenge and expedite a lot of that procedure huh

2018-07-02 21:34:33 UTC  

my state would be the first to ban it

2018-07-02 21:36:21 UTC  

As far as I understand yes. States changes law-acting illegally- circuit court shoots it down, goes to SC within 6 months

2018-07-02 21:36:42 UTC  

Won’t get a blanket ban since it’ll be a stated rights argument

2018-07-02 21:37:39 UTC  

hahaaaa interesting. our state leg is packed with pro lifers and our gov is all about it too. hopefully we can lead the fight

2018-07-02 21:37:47 UTC  

Barret was also a Scalia clerk

2018-07-02 21:38:05 UTC  

So fingers crossed , most others seem compromised in some way

2018-07-02 21:38:26 UTC  

idk she seems good but i wouldn’t much trust a women. there’s been a lot of good justices nominated then once on bench they change

2018-07-02 21:38:38 UTC  

Coulter say Don Willet who seems very good

2018-07-02 21:38:43 UTC  

Nationalist type

2018-07-02 21:39:22 UTC  

He’s anti degenerate, Christian, anti immigration currently on Texas SC

2018-07-02 21:39:28 UTC  

Also anti Deep state

2018-07-02 21:40:18 UTC  

I’d want him or Barret-likely as in last list and put on circuit courts as place holders in case SC seat frees up

2018-07-02 21:40:34 UTC  

Other likely is Neocon Kavanagh

2018-07-02 21:44:31 UTC  

‘White male’ lol two of the males on the court are Jews

2018-07-02 22:24:06 UTC  

WEEEEEEEEINBEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRG

2018-07-02 22:24:33 UTC  

the way people are pushing this makes me think they have a way to make conservative women flip

2018-07-02 22:24:41 UTC  

maybe show them some crying children or something

2018-07-02 22:25:02 UTC  

Yeah

2018-07-02 22:25:09 UTC  

Don Willet it is then I guess