Message from @Solipsistic Vinarchy
Discord ID: 463448383412240394
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TALK THE TALK
CANT WALK THE WALK
frickin LOSER
low energy
This is good midterm optics
Mexico have confirmed themselves as the enemy and Trump is defeating them already
the nigga hasnt even taken office yet
and hes already taking the knee
Lol
Bend the knee or lose the head
looks like he chose wisely
But about Nelson
Im reading about his time fighting Denmark
where he disobeyed his virgin superior's orders to retreat
but he stayed and destroyed the dannish defenses
Yeah good leader needs to be able to challenge authority
We did Battle of the Nile in school
In my school we spent almost a week on andrew jackson
<:dab:402362224527671306>
No chads like that in our school
We learnt of Chad Charles I
But only in the context of OH MUH GAWD HE SHUT DOWN DEMOCRACY IM SO GLAD HE WAS BEHEADED
Under his personal rule England made peace with France and Spain, increased royal income etc
@Solipsistic Vinarchy who is this wired sources? seen everyone RTing them only recently
People saying Barret most likely seems great
Immigration hawk, big white family and very Christian
would be a big win but unfortunately she is a woman
meta i have dumb question for you on how supreme court works
Also she’s got a black adopted kid
What’s the Q
so supreme court doesn’t really get to organically choose to over turn abortion rights obviously. but they pick and choose from a list of thousands of cases before them. so how can we be so sure roe v wade gets over turned with new justice?
Well we can’t exactly. So say a state challenges the law, this would go to SC potentially here they could say the states now decide on abortion
Then you could get states to ban it individually don’t know how many would do that tho
okay so they don’t necessarily have to wait for a case pertaining to abortion to come across their desk then make a ruling that’s broad enough to give states that option, a state can challenge and expedite a lot of that procedure huh
my state would be the first to ban it
As far as I understand yes. States changes law-acting illegally- circuit court shoots it down, goes to SC within 6 months
Won’t get a blanket ban since it’ll be a stated rights argument