This is good midterm optics

Mexico have confirmed themselves as the enemy and Trump is defeating them already

the nigga hasnt even taken office yet

and hes already taking the knee

Lol

Bend the knee or lose the head

looks like he chose wisely

But about Nelson

Im reading about his time fighting Denmark

where he disobeyed his virgin superior's orders to retreat

but he stayed and destroyed the dannish defenses

Yeah good leader needs to be able to challenge authority

We did Battle of the Nile in school

In my school we spent almost a week on andrew jackson

<:dab:402362224527671306>

even watched a video

No chads like that in our school

We learnt of Chad Charles I

But only in the context of OH MUH GAWD HE SHUT DOWN DEMOCRACY IM SO GLAD HE WAS BEHEADED

Under his personal rule England made peace with France and Spain, increased royal income etc

@Solipsistic Vinarchy who is this wired sources? seen everyone RTing them only recently

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/02/us/politics/trump-supreme-court-nomination.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/the-fix/wp/2018/07/02/one-possible-trump-supreme-court-pick-who-makes-too-much-sense/

People saying Barret most likely seems great

Immigration hawk, big white family and very Christian

would be a big win but unfortunately she is a woman

meta i have dumb question for you on how supreme court works

Also she’s got a black adopted kid

What’s the Q

so supreme court doesn’t really get to organically choose to over turn abortion rights obviously. but they pick and choose from a list of thousands of cases before them. so how can we be so sure roe v wade gets over turned with new justice?

Well we can’t exactly. So say a state challenges the law, this would go to SC potentially here they could say the states now decide on abortion

Then you could get states to ban it individually don’t know how many would do that tho

okay so they don’t necessarily have to wait for a case pertaining to abortion to come across their desk then make a ruling that’s broad enough to give states that option, a state can challenge and expedite a lot of that procedure huh

my state would be the first to ban it

As far as I understand yes. States changes law-acting illegally- circuit court shoots it down, goes to SC within 6 months

Won’t get a blanket ban since it’ll be a stated rights argument

hahaaaa interesting. our state leg is packed with pro lifers and our gov is all about it too. hopefully we can lead the fight

Barret was also a Scalia clerk

So fingers crossed , most others seem compromised in some way

idk she seems good but i wouldn’t much trust a women. there’s been a lot of good justices nominated then once on bench they change

Coulter say Don Willet who seems very good