Message from @Julie Shoraga
Discord ID: 644100555689689089
@Citizen Z is that it?
HEY
@OLD MELBY hi
No there is more
more?
more what?
Evolution is true. This is not debateable
@Citizen Z not only does it not matter the amount of carbon that was in the atmosphere, but we don’t use carbon dating when a sample is more than a few thousand years old
Nothing cant create itself. Creation is true. Not debatable
No one said something created itself
You’re so incredibly out of tune with the mainstream view of biology for the past several hundred years
Even in the age of Darwin, no one thought that evolution was false. They were debating the mechanism responsible for evolution
^ yeah im interested in knowing both sides of this
we know microevolution exists
mutations of bacteria
along with many organisms
its simply genetics actually
change in alleles
not only that but the similar bone/skeletal structure of organisms like human hand bones shape in sea creatures
@fastlanejam “micro”evolution implies “macro”evolution. I put them in quotation marks because scientists don’t make a distinction between the two because they know they’re the same thing, just over different time periods.
Aka, small changes that occur over small periods of time implies large changes that accumulate over large periods of time
If evolution was real why is it not continuing. Why are not monkeys turning into men right now. All I see is de-evolution.
It is still continuing, the fact that it looks like de-evolution is because we're able to keep those who would have died prematurely alive, and with that keeping their genes alive @Julie Shoraga
Also, evolution is extremely slow, in the past few hundred years we've known about it's existence and started understanding it, not much has changed at the larger scale of beings so to say
Also, arguing that in evolution nothing creates itself is not correct, unless you mean abiogenesis but that's complicated af and I don't understand it. Abiogenesis is not part of evolution
You cant get back to evolution unless you have abiogenesis
These theories are complete garbage
https://youtu.be/_zQXgJ-dXM4he is a synthetic chemist with 200 patents
Pretty much proves abiogensis at least on earth is utterly impossible
He has a few videosvery comprehensive. He goes through the process of actually making a complex molecule. To say it is difficult is the understatement of the year. invented the nanocar. a molecular car with actual rotating wheelsthe bottom line is no abiogeneses ....organic matter from inorganic matter, you can't even get to evolution. rock babies... impossible
Abiogenesis is often misinterpreted
The only thing that it tells us is that we can get organic molecules from inorganic and natural processes
Just look at the miller-urey experiments
Organic matter from inorganic matter.
Rock babies
Your ancestors are rocks.
😂 @Say
@Citizen Z what...? You understand that all molecules are made up of the same things, right?
Say... your argument just doesn’t hold water. Rock babies do NOT exist.. and we are a Creation.... evolution is a sham
Are you trolling? @A Search for Roche's Rifle
rock babies?
Who made your family
What made your family
Your ancestors are gas and rocks?
my ancestors were not, but they were made from this that once were gas and rocks
things*