Message from @Mattie

Discord ID: 643236494043119626


2019-11-10 23:46:38 UTC  

Are you trying to say that one form of harm is acceptable whereas another form of harm isn't?

2019-11-10 23:46:43 UTC  

You are potentially exposing a child who can not make their own decisions to diseases which can prove fatal

2019-11-10 23:47:30 UTC  

Their is a difference between a pin prick and a bit of redness for a day and contracting measles

2019-11-10 23:47:36 UTC  

There not their

2019-11-10 23:47:58 UTC  

So, you're a moral relativist?

2019-11-10 23:48:14 UTC  

I thought you were for informed CONSENT?

2019-11-10 23:48:24 UTC  

Children can not give consent

2019-11-10 23:48:37 UTC  

But their caretaker can.

2019-11-10 23:49:24 UTC  

And if their caretaker hit them or neglected to feed them or fed them rotten food they would be taken away from the care giver

2019-11-10 23:49:40 UTC  

Then they wouldn't be a caretaker.

2019-11-10 23:49:40 UTC  

Based

2019-11-10 23:50:12 UTC  

And then another caretaker would be initiated, if there was someone willing to be a caretaker.

2019-11-10 23:50:31 UTC  

Not vaccinating your kids when you’re able to is child abuse

2019-11-10 23:50:32 UTC  

A caretaker doesn't initiate harm.

2019-11-10 23:50:32 UTC  

Yes authorised by the state

2019-11-10 23:51:01 UTC  

The caretakers job is to prevent harm coming to the child

2019-11-10 23:51:02 UTC  

Giving potential harm is abuse.

2019-11-10 23:51:32 UTC  

Allowing your child to contract an easily preventable disease is abuse

2019-11-10 23:51:34 UTC  

Yea, the caretaker's choice is to prevent harm.

2019-11-10 23:52:04 UTC  

@Say allowing you child to be exposed to harm is abuse, yes.

2019-11-10 23:52:10 UTC  

If they refuse to immunise the child and the child then receives measles which is entirely preventable for the majority of the populous then the care taker has failed in their job

2019-11-10 23:53:09 UTC  

@hootersforshooters if you are comparing the possible risks of vaccines to the harm they prevent you need to do some fact checking

2019-11-10 23:53:50 UTC  
2019-11-10 23:54:10 UTC  

The rewards completely outweigh the risks

2019-11-10 23:54:23 UTC  

That is why they exist

2019-11-10 23:54:27 UTC  

Even if it did cause autism, you’re better off being vaccinated

2019-11-10 23:54:34 UTC  

More people have died or been harmed this century in the US by the measles vaccine than by contracting measles. 149 times greater. So, yes....there is a greater chance of killing you child through the vaccine than there is from contracting the disease. So, I would say that giving the measles vaccine is more harmful than the disease.

2019-11-10 23:55:06 UTC  

Yes because measles had been practically eradicated due to vaccines

2019-11-10 23:55:22 UTC  

@Say "Even if it did cause autism, you’re better off being vaccinated"
This is what psychopaths say.

2019-11-10 23:55:25 UTC  

“There are lies, darn lies, a d statistics “

2019-11-10 23:55:40 UTC  

No it’s not. It’s what reasonable people say

2019-11-10 23:55:42 UTC  

@Say no statistics. Evidence.

2019-11-10 23:55:57 UTC  

1 in 110 kids get autism

2019-11-10 23:56:00 UTC  

Their is nothing wrong with autism

2019-11-10 23:56:04 UTC  

Supposedly because of vaccines

2019-11-10 23:56:21 UTC  

Influenza mortality in in the 30s was 40%

2019-11-10 23:56:24 UTC  

I have aspergers and 146 iq I'm also not gonna die of measles

2019-11-10 23:56:44 UTC  

Ummmmm.....no.......reasonable people are not morally relativistic. @Say

2019-11-10 23:57:00 UTC  

Im not a mathematician or anything, but 1/110 is less than 40%

2019-11-10 23:57:12 UTC  

Also mmr does not cause autism so yh

2019-11-10 23:57:57 UTC  

@hootersforshooters do u live in Europe or america or another contjnent