Message from @Say

Discord ID: 643239461273993254


2019-11-10 23:59:04 UTC  

But, whose counting? Since it has nothing to do with the subject matter.

2019-11-10 23:59:26 UTC  

It absolutely has to do with the subject matter

2019-11-11 00:00:22 UTC  

The subject matter is......harm and the right to harm.....aka coercion. So, if you want to stray away from that, well, that won't help anyone.

2019-11-11 00:00:31 UTC  

If this is a cost/reward exchange (which it isnt) then you have a better chance if dying by not being vaccinated then getting autism from vaccines

2019-11-11 00:00:52 UTC  
2019-11-11 00:00:54 UTC  

@Say so, moral relativism.....

2019-11-11 00:01:02 UTC  

Statistics are all important and comparing all the recorded statistics not just cherry picking ones that support your current point is the basis of a coherant argument in any debate regarding science

2019-11-11 00:01:18 UTC  

You think you are allowed a to force people to do things that may harm them, right?

2019-11-11 00:01:25 UTC  

What does moral relativism have anything to do with this

2019-11-11 00:01:40 UTC  

That's because the chance of getting autism from vaccines is zero

2019-11-11 00:02:13 UTC  

@Mattie you enjoy all the statistics you want. The subject matter is harm, coercion.....like you said...informed consent.

2019-11-11 00:02:31 UTC  

Yes. People should run the **incredibly** low chance of being harmed from a vaccine to avoid the very real chance of death that comes from not being vaccinated

2019-11-11 00:02:32 UTC  

@Say you think you're allowed to harm people .

2019-11-11 00:02:52 UTC  

Yes but statistics are still a very important point

2019-11-11 00:02:58 UTC  

That you're allowed to coerce people.

2019-11-11 00:03:04 UTC  

You may have to cause someone pain to fix a broken bone, but in the end, you won’t die from that broken bone

2019-11-11 00:03:09 UTC  

@Mattie not to this subject matter.

2019-11-11 00:03:26 UTC  

You might break a few ribs while giving CPR, but it’s worth it to save the person’s life

2019-11-11 00:03:29 UTC  

@Say so, you believe in coercion, right?

2019-11-11 00:03:36 UTC  

By that logic we shouldn't relocate a dislocated shoulder because we could cause harm

2019-11-11 00:03:58 UTC  

@hootersforshooters so you think we shouldn’t give people CPR, right?

2019-11-11 00:04:07 UTC  

Cause it might break a few ribs and cause them pain

2019-11-11 00:04:12 UTC  

@Say "You might break a few ribs while giving CPR, but it’s worth it to save the person’s life"
Please stop with the strawman. You're not a real doctor, are you?

2019-11-11 00:04:17 UTC  

Or ct or xrays either

2019-11-11 00:04:19 UTC  

I am

2019-11-11 00:04:23 UTC  

Because radiation

2019-11-11 00:04:24 UTC  

It’s not a strawman

2019-11-11 00:04:34 UTC  

Strawman strawman strawman....

2019-11-11 00:04:46 UTC  

Broken ribs are a common side affect of cpr

2019-11-11 00:04:54 UTC  

You’re saying that it’s unacceptable to potentially harm someone in order to save their life

2019-11-11 00:04:57 UTC  

Coercion, yes or no?

2019-11-11 00:05:01 UTC  

You are hiding behind a straw man

2019-11-11 00:05:19 UTC  

If you don't like a valid argument you call it a straw man lol

2019-11-11 00:05:25 UTC  

^

2019-11-11 00:05:29 UTC  

It's impossible to create a strawman when sticking to the subject matter.

2019-11-11 00:05:42 UTC  

Or that strawman

2019-11-11 00:05:53 UTC  

Saying that its not on topic

2019-11-11 00:05:54 UTC  

Analogies aren’t strawmen

2019-11-11 00:05:55 UTC  

@Mattie um, no......it's not a valid argument. That's why

2019-11-11 00:06:09 UTC  

Analogies are useful to see logical consistency

2019-11-11 00:06:28 UTC  

Inaccurate analogies are, though. False comparison.