If you’re being logically consistent then you should be against CPR

And xrays

And operating on possibly malignant tumours

The person needing CPR has no capability of giving consent. Therefore you are imposing an involuntary hierarchy over them. They are no longer ethical actors, but you are their caretaker now. That is why you can do that.

And pretty much all preemptive medicine

Alright im not gonna carry on this conversation. Clearly you have no intention of being intellectually honest

@Say and how is that dishonest?

You pick and choose when consent is consent

But please, do run away if you can't handle it. I understand....

You continually place words in other people’s mouths and use strawmen

By your logic an unconscious persons right to consent is passed to the nearest person

In what world is that a thing

@Say nice. Youre trying to impeach me by using what I impeached you with. Try a little harder, will you?

I went to school for 12 years to become a doctor. It is admittedly frustrating when a layman with zero understanding of biology and chemistry tries to debunk one of the most well-accepted principles of medicine

@Mattie it's passed to a person willing to be their caretaker. No coercion.

But they have no choice on who that is

@Say your appeal to authority means nothing. This subject matter is about morality. Please don't strawman.....AGAIN.

Appeals to authority isn’t a fallacy genius

Appeal to false authority is

@Mattie exactly. That's why there's a thing called "caretaker"

Appealing to experts in the field of medicine Isnt a fallacy

And i tried explaining the biological basis of vaccinations but you refused to listen

@Say you've never heard of expert bias? Because you're doing it right now.

@Say their not worth the time you can't change their mind the phrase ok boomer applies to this very situation

@hootersforshooters Lol ok boomer

Fr, stop pretending you know more than someone who does this stuff for a living

How many pharmacology classes have you taken @hootersforshooters

Im gonna guess zero

@Say once again....? The subject matter ISNT biology. It's morality. Your EXPERTISE is forcing you to put on your blinders and only argue what you want to argue and NOT the subject matter. If you can't adhere to the point at hand, please don't try to sabotage the discussion with your strawman positions.

Ok boomer

You wouldn't barge into nasa headquarters with no knowledge of propulsion and demand that they rebuild their propulsion system to your specifications

@Say how many morality classes have you taken?

I’ve taken plenty of philosophy classes and i can guarantee I’ve read more books on it than you

Doctors have to go through ethics classes so quite a few hours worth I imagune

^

Ethics isn't morality. Neither is philosophy. Next.

Boomer moment

The noun for morality is ethics

“Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions[5][6][7] about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.”

( used with a plural verb ) moral principles, as of an individual:His ethics forbade betrayal of a confidence.

( used with a singular verb ) that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions.

So tell me again ethics and morality are not the same