@rivenator12113 you are literally proving yourself wrong lol

@Jondar02 Any links? http://gnome-experiment.com/ This is what I got and from what I see it wasn't done in a vacuum chamber.

Wth your basing your argument off a gnome?

Searching for it rn

@smallyoda111 I never advocated for this experiment, I stated that it was flawed since it failed to recognize that air density affects weight and it's disinformation. @Jondar02 Thanks

I thought you meant that gravity is fake and it’s just air density

This isn't a matter of proving flat earth or not, it's about proving how you should have a controlled experiment.

When you want to prove something.

https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/k-4/features/F_Measuring_Gravity_With_Grace.html @rivenator12113, though it's from NASA and I can guess your stance on it. I do agree with the fact that that experiment is inaccurate due to possible uncontrolled variables

@rivenator12113 you are either confusing me with someone else or strawmaning me. I said you should test it if you don't believe the facts.

And yes gravity is different where you go but only in the very very very very low amounts for humans because our mass is so low but for a blue wale it may be different (were it on land) because the difference in the magnetic pull is not large enough to affect light weight mass for us to fell a considerable difference unless we teleported instantly to the two most different places of gravitational pull in the earth and even then it will be slight. Because for example when you rub two large magnets together can you fell a difference? That will not work but I’m just trying to say this this difference in gravity is not in any way significant

I have made a theoretical prediction of an object falling for 2 or 10 meters at a different height in a vacuum chamber, I would post it here but my roles don't allow it...

Different height, thus different gravitational pull

Hot

Jondar, that NASA website isn't trying to prove gravity exists

Thats because NASA thinks gravity works better on the flat earth model @Quorum

That article is explaining that the errors they found *compared to* the spherical model was small enough that they could approximate the earth is flat without too much of a problem

@smallyoda111 gravity is missing in different places on earth

were* small enough

@grvgrl yes they are saying the flat earth is justified

They’re saying they can use that approximation in their experiment. That’s kind of the thing physics does. It takes the simplest approximation it can for the problem it’s trying to solve. But that doesn’t mean the approximation is the reality

For example, if you’re trying to bake a cake, you can put in a rough cup of sugar and it doesn’t have to be to exact to get you a cake. If you’re doing a sensitive chemical reaction, you’d need to be more sure about how much you had

Cern omits gravity

Doesnt work for the standard model

https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model

Actually research on the graviton is an active field. People don’t know if it’s massive or not or if it’s unnecessary given general relativity, but it’s not neglected

I’d be happy to answer any questions you had about gravity

What gravity?

What is gravity?

It’s an effect we experience due to the warping of spacetime caused by massive objects!

After a cursory google search (because I’ve never heard of it), it sounds like they’re arguing that gravity is actually the result of a slight charge differential, and so is actually a coulomb (electric) force. I would definitely disagree with that

Cmon please don't quote mine, they're not saying the Earth is flat or flat earth is justified, it's saying that *assuming* the earth is flat *specifically for math simplification* is easier. Each quote mine document I've seen always says they assume a flat earth purely for math.

wait til you guys hear about *assuming small angle*

@🎃Oakheart🎃 This is about your post like 5 days ago, but the reason metal doesn't melt in the thermosphere even though it's hot is because there isn't enough air to transfer the heat in the thermosphere.

Ah, like the molecules are spaced apart?

Yeah

I didn't know that for a while either