nothing as proof

<a:PepeCoffee:634141178056671262>

but keep patting yourself on the back! keep telling yourself you're right

!mute @Tae

Troll.

"South*StarToday at 2:32 AM
If earth is flat, than earth Chan has flat chest"

Ye Ik him. He’s a lil troll. I told em he was gonna get muted if he said stuff like that

Well hopefully he learns.

https://youtu.be/_t-iCK1vqCc
No further questions.

@oh hi mark 1 minute in the video and shes saying circumnavigation is not possible on flat earth which is false. Condemnation without investigation once again.

@CryptoCypher we can test this ourselves if you want to

Also, I’d still like to hear the mechanism behind objects accelerating downwards

Something other than “Thats just how it is”

@Say nice idea, but... just show proof of curvature and proof of rotation. there's plenty of explanations for the observation, commonly referred to as "gravity" you've likely already heard and dismissed them already because you so desperately want to hold on tightly to your precious globe model, with no real reasoning other than "but scientist xyz told me or NASA this or Neil Degrasse Tyson that" If you're not going to respond with proof of the things I'm asking for "curvature" or "rotation" I have no real interest in this conversation!

Relax mate, I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t want a conversation

Here’s a relatively simple proof for curvature: put a stick in the ground. At noon, measure the angle at which the shadow from the sun makes. Then, have a friend or someone else a few degrees north/south do the same. On a flat earth, the angle should be different than what they would be on a curved earth

oh sticks LMAO

hahaha

Also, you do need a force to explain the acceleration of objects

No sticks prove nothing

Why

come on, provide a better one than the sticks BS

Why do you need a force

Do you want to have an actual conversation? Or are you going to continue acting like that

You just want it?

You need a force because things don’t accelerate without a net force

well... do you have a better "proof" than sticks?

No, it’s just how it works. The acceleration of objects necessitates a net force

Crypto, stop arguing dishonestly. I presented a proof. Accept it or reject it and give your reasoning

No! the sticks thing is not proof! this is not me being dishonest, it's me being realistic. Those sticks prove nothing

Explain why it’s not proof

because you're just parroting the same BS you heard from one of your leaders! come on man, use some real logical reasoning here. we've heard the sticks stuff before, many times, it's utter nonsense. Now, are you going to provide real proof, or do you really want to argue about sticks? cos honestly, it's pathetic

Im not just repeating it. I understand the math behind it.

How far away is your sun in your model?

we don't have a model

I dont have a model for how far the sun is

They believe it's much closer than the globe earth sun.

It looks pretty close

Feels close