when in fact you’d have to win it back from the *powers that be*

I'm kinda splitting hairs, yeah, but my point is that the media and the left actually have very little agency of their own. They're just instruments.

They're *all* the left. It's as much as I can put without always saying "Jews"

...and you can't *take* someone else's media. All you can do is displace them by undermining their narratives in order to better resonate with your target audience.

for the record, I never said anything about taking it back from the left..

We have to replace it all

somewhat related: we need an identitarian version of PragerU and all those conservative talking point generators

But, they literally *own* the media. Like, it's their company.

That's what I mean.

ah ok

It's their company and they direct the news

@Flint Agreed.

Btw, I'm not going after you or anything, lol. Just being a semantics sperg...

They manufacture consent and dissent with their institution they legally own.

So if one lesbian bishop becomes the head of a church, they have the power to multiply the news to the whole nation. We don't get to do that with those who stand fast.

That's the raison d'etre of any media organization. They don't exist to inform, but to mold opinion. There's no such thing as an objective media organization. They're inherently as biased and agenda-driven as the people who comprise them inevitably are. It's much more useful to look at every single media outfit as a PR operation for the people who own them.

The church, like white people in the US (because it's the same people) lack the will to fight and defend themselves. So the problem is the same.

Want to know how whites are doing in the US? Look at how the churches are doing.

-corruption in leadership

-monetary fraud

-wasteful spending

-weak, easily conquered, spineless people

-infiltrated and filled with subversives

also, just like the left can take one freak and amplify them, they can take one normal person who speaks up and destroy them. so for our side, it would take a large number of influential people to present a unified front

and that’s difficult

The commies are right about one thing: *the material conditions*.
Whites can and will win, the moment they decide they have to fight, but their material conditions are too lavish right now.

The Prager U and CRTV types are buying tons pf Youtube ads. Especially for right leaning content. Basically any monetized James Allsup video has a Prager U ad.

Why would Joe six pack with his comfy chair, beer, and football--or--Johnny bigbux, with his 401k, business, and late model car, give it up???

Whites lack the will to sacrifice time and money on a cause that almost no other whites will join them in.

Thus, IE is trying to galvanize white racial concioussness

it’s a shame because it’s a good model (the 3-5 minute policy clip) but it’s being wasted on muh taxes and muh Israel

*That is our struggle: to get whites to struggle*

Which is embarrassing and shameful, but that's what we're dealing with.

Tucker Carlson would be awesome for right-wing info clips

@Sam Anderson That's surprising to hear, I thought Prager hated all forms of white identity politics

@Virgil they are trying to bring people back to the reservation. The conservative audience that is almost there to our ideas is liable to fall for the ad and click away from the further right content.

Well, then we force them to pay attention @Sam Anderson

they’re right to be concerned lol... I’m probably not the only one who started out as a normie Republican

become too big, too loud, too powerful to ignore

Allsup is making money of Prager Jew ads? Nice I've been browsing with adblock for a long time now

Yep. The conservatives have the institutions and the money. But we have the vigor, and the deeper motivation than they do.