otherwise society might end up in chaos

so its a good course of action

anyway do you agree with what i said timebomb?

about subjective starting point

Bs

It's all subjective, no matter how you split it

thats so naive

It starts subjective and ends the same way

learn abit more about the issue and we can talk more

no it doesnt

simple logic

Elaborate

if u take some time to understand it ull agree

ok

lets say we set well being as the startingpoint

now u have 3 actions you may take

Well being?

u can then look at these action and judge whats the action thats best for well being

yea lets say of all humans

well beaing of all humans

u may want it to include animals etc but lets not go there now

u can then look at moral choices

and say which is leading to the goal of making humanity be well

or do least amount of harm

u can say some examples

and we judge them

maybe a dilemma?

lets look at the one with the train

Do you agree well-being is at the center of morality @floridaswamptrash?

a person can change the route of train to kill either 5 or 1

Jesus what did I just miss?

Or... multi track drifting!

killing 5 is less good than killing 1 without more knowledge

Oooh you think ghosts are real @brother mutton?

so you are ok killing 1 instead

@Timebomb eh to one extent or the other, why?

multi trackuuu driftingu

if the 5 are criminals and the 1 is a saint it might be better to kill the 5 tho

Morality is absolute simply stated in the golden rule: do unto others as you would like done to you

And gay frogs? Haha

Just curious, I was looking at your roles