hey

to the core

is down

doesnt matter tho

enter of mass sounds good

*center

there is easy proof to show earth ... but noone here would ever care to test it anyway

but i got a question

any of the fe here noticed what happend at youtube?

mathieus did u notice what happend with youtube?

u didnt?

they now work against fe

they make sure u cant find videos that are pro fe

nah its rather new

6 month or so

they had new policy

was even in the news

no

i know that there biased tho

xD

the better question is why would they let u spread fe in the frist place

i mean they let it spread over years why?

how can that even be possible?
'

?

its good to think for urselves i encourage that

any of u ever ready hpmor?

i love that thing it even explains how science works and is so damn funny

i love the 2,4,6, test for example

if u have 3 boats on a river and have a straight vision from first to last then the middle one will be higer than 1. and 3. if there far enough spaced out

thats the best i got

yea but how can the one in middle be higher than 3.?

it should be same hight

water cant have hills

or can it?

can there be hill in water?

what=?

by perspective u see one is higher then the one further away?

i dont understand that

it should be straight line

water is level or not?

yes but that is not what im talking about

thats completely different point

hm

i only read about it but u search truth right?

u can set it up rather easy

just need 3 boats

and maybe laster or some

on first boat u set laser to get to second and third

i cant sorry

it was expirement they did in uk like 200 years ago

ah right i got some for u

u said gravity doesnt exist right?

ther eis ony wher they show it does

iv?

they used telescope back then

and seen second boat higer than 3.

which shoulda been impossible

anyway i cant prove that

its the 3 boats

if u ahve 2 it doesnt say much

3. is the independent

i guess

or what is an independent variable there?

what is science?

i love the thing about falsification

u need to try and show ur own claim to be false is good science

anyway as far as i understand science u take facts try to explain em then try to make predictions that can show ur wrong

and only if u have a way to show how it can be wrong u can atuaclly have it call hypothesis

and then u try to disprove it

and if u fail its good evidence for it being close to truth

but ther eis no such thing as proof

only the best possible explanaition

i for example also love how it went with einstein

he never really showed newton to be wrong just that newtonican mechanics didnt work on the very small and very big

so newtonian mechanics is still used and basically true where it was used but on the very small and big scale its not working

on on those u need einsteins thero and quantum theory

thats so beautiful

u guys read about that?

yea u try to disprove what ur hyposesis says

u try to show ur false

and if u cant after really trying ur doing good

why would that be wrong?

its the best i heard so far and it makes perfect sense

its so genious

a concept

u cant proof anything

thats what the scientest know

its what is the basic of our science they know u cant proof anything

u cant proof earth is flat or round

u can just show that u cant disprove it

cause they cant show its false

if u cant show its false u say ok i give up the world probably is like that

thats the story of quantum theory

xD

a theroy is an hyposesis that made predictions and tryd to show its false and failed in every instance

its the higest thing u can reach in science

its explaining facts of the worl

facts are things u find and a theroy trys to explain facts

yes in normal usage

but in science its not sued that way