Message from @negatic
Discord ID: 647137713056776193
It starts subjective and ends the same way
learn abit more about the issue and we can talk more
no it doesnt
simple logic
Elaborate
if u take some time to understand it ull agree
ok
lets say we set well being as the startingpoint
now u have 3 actions you may take
Well being?
u can then look at these action and judge whats the action thats best for well being
yea lets say of all humans
well beaing of all humans
u may want it to include animals etc but lets not go there now
u can then look at moral choices
and say which is leading to the goal of making humanity be well
or do least amount of harm
u can say some examples
and we judge them
maybe a dilemma?
Do you agree well-being is at the center of morality @floridaswamptrash?
a person can change the route of train to kill either 5 or 1
Jesus what did I just miss?
Or... multi track drifting!
killing 5 is less good than killing 1 without more knowledge
Oooh you think ghosts are real @brother mutton?
so you are ok killing 1 instead
@Timebomb eh to one extent or the other, why?
multi trackuuu driftingu
if the 5 are criminals and the 1 is a saint it might be better to kill the 5 tho
Morality is absolute simply stated in the golden rule: do unto others as you would like done to you
And gay frogs? Haha
Just curious, I was looking at your roles
If you're looking it from that point of view then sure you could a lot of objective morality @negatic
@Chrono Triggered errr that doesn’t go for everyone
@negatic better to be safe than sorry, flip the train and kill all 6
^^^ lol
In a sense anyways
@floridaswamptrash yea but the problem is what basic tennats should we choose for morality
@Timebomb yeah the gay frogs thing is more a meme than anything