Message from @negatic
Discord ID: 647137635013361668
It's all subjective, no matter how you split it
thats so naive
It starts subjective and ends the same way
learn abit more about the issue and we can talk more
no it doesnt
simple logic
Elaborate
if u take some time to understand it ull agree
ok
lets say we set well being as the startingpoint
now u have 3 actions you may take
Well being?
u can then look at these action and judge whats the action thats best for well being
yea lets say of all humans
well beaing of all humans
u may want it to include animals etc but lets not go there now
u can then look at moral choices
and say which is leading to the goal of making humanity be well
or do least amount of harm
u can say some examples
maybe a dilemma?
lets look at the one with the train
Do you agree well-being is at the center of morality @floridaswamptrash?
a person can change the route of train to kill either 5 or 1
Jesus what did I just miss?
Or... multi track drifting!
killing 5 is less good than killing 1 without more knowledge
Oooh you think ghosts are real @brother mutton?
so you are ok killing 1 instead
@Timebomb eh to one extent or the other, why?
multi trackuuu driftingu
if the 5 are criminals and the 1 is a saint it might be better to kill the 5 tho
Morality is absolute simply stated in the golden rule: do unto others as you would like done to you
And gay frogs? Haha
Just curious, I was looking at your roles
If you're looking it from that point of view then sure you could a lot of objective morality @negatic
@Chrono Triggered errr that doesn’t go for everyone
@negatic better to be safe than sorry, flip the train and kill all 6
^^^ lol
In a sense anyways