Ahh lol

And also I don't think the Bolsheviks put Lincoln in power

*stays out of this convo so he doesn't seem out of touch*

@MrBland - VA The rabid Abolitionists brough Lincoln to power, and they are the direct ancestors of the SWPLs and SJWs. All they cared about was destroying the fellow Whites and virtue signaling. Back then their justification was religion. Now it is the lie of egalitarianism.

Same with commies...first it was class warfare, now it's race.

They fail, so they change tactics and (hopefully) fail again.

Eh tbh the slavery was a really bad system and the southern aristocracy was using it to keep all the money and power in their hands

Cultural Marxism seems to have proven quite effective though, esp compared to original class based Marxism.

Some really...interesting takes in here.

uh oh, leadership is here to ruin our fun. <:sad:366743316475281408>

Plus, they were never around Blacks. Up North Blacks were few and far between. They had no earthly idea how brutally stupid and dangerous Blacks could be. They just needed a victim class to uplift and worship them for their transcendent kindness.

Saying "the evil sjws killed white civilization" isn't really accurate for the Civil war, there were a ton of legitimate reasons to be an abolitionist

I don't think "confederateamericanpride.com" is that credible of a source lol

I hear you, I was googling confederate Bolshevik and American Bolshevik and reading headlines. So not an informed statement

>confederateamericanpride.com

I see you found my blog.

There were some Americans that went to go fight for the Bolsheviks in Spain but thats about the only thing I can think of them doing

blogs are so 2010

And that was in the 1930s, not the 1830s lol

@The Soy Goy True it is not a direct analogy, but it is a part of a common thread of Leftist lies and fantasies that the upper class and the middle class began buying into after Rousseau took his poison mainstream.

@Deleted User so you're the one that stole my domain then

You can still join me as a regular contributor 😉

It all goes back a lot farther than we sometimes think IMHO.

Yeah I'm just don't think that oversimplification and revisionism is healthy when you're trying to craft an argument. Just cause it's easy to debunk

Very well said.

There are a ton of legitimate reasons to believe in all the things the old egalitarians believed in that don't include pushing globohomo and multiculturalism

@The Soy Goy "oversimplification and revisionism"
You just described the modern left perfectly. 👌🏻

I hear you on the oversimplification, but I see too often people go the other way seeing complexity when it is simple human emotion unconstrained by intellect.

The main thing being that most of those people literally didn't even consider non Europeans to be human, so obviously today's situation was not their intention haha

Intellect is not the word I was looking for...

Logic maybe?

Basically way to much of the "feminine side" is in our culture and politics.

80% of teachers (whom all our children have to learn from) are women...

There should be no wonder why the "feminine side" is in full force with the rabid leftist youth of today.

I see authoritarianism as masculine, and egalitarianism as feminine.

Eh, plenty of these "soy boys" are authoritarians (Antifa).

They're not mutually exclusive

But they approach everything from the feminine side.

yeah

I don't see that. Though I know what you mean.

The military is a really good example of something thats both authoritarian and egalitarian