Message from @Duke of Mecklenburg
Discord ID: 563922569519038467
Were talking about Long range shooting specifically
I scrolled up to earlier in the conversation
Should have clarified
Further than 2,700
20mm anti material rifle ftw
@Duke of Mecklenburg they might suck for long range shooting, but that doesn't make those wildcats a superior all around cartridges. Namely because there aren't similar loads like the Mk. 211 Raufoss or the SLAP. You could compare Lapua .338 against those as they are all meant for exactly the same purpose, unlike a multipurpose cartridge like the BMG.
What gave you the idea militaries choose the best option? It's always the cheapest option, very few militaries are in the spot where they have unlimited budget.
.416 isnt a wildcat
I guess I'm a retard for seeing that you can't compare an all around cartridge against a sniper cartridge. Comparing .50 BMG and .338 Lapua is equally retarded as comparing 9x19 to 9x39.
.416 can do anything a 50 could
Nearly
sure it can
Including better penetration
but it's not superiour
But it is
As a long range cartridge
Which was the whole point
they are not comparable, it's not usable in a machine gun
That was never an argument
no, the whole point for the original argument was that a katana was better than toilet paper
well that's what started this, a clear comparison with two unrelated things
That had nothing to do with anything I ever talked about
then maybe you shouldn't have replied to me
I'm still right tho
<:feelsgoodman:379788756980334592>
.416 Barrett MG...when?
well, you would be as you don't have any real life experience on the matter
What matter?
anything beyond an internet argument about global military
Never argued about military stuff
where you insist you know better than the said militaries
.50 BMG is strictly military
When did you buy your last Mk. 211?
We still talking armor penetration
Or we on long range anger
You fucking moron
The .50 is common with Longrange shooters
300 PRC master race