As a long range cartridge

Which was the whole point

they are not comparable, it's not usable in a machine gun

That was never an argument

At all

no, the whole point for the original argument was that a katana was better than toilet paper

well that's what started this, a clear comparison with two unrelated things

That had nothing to do with anything I ever talked about

then maybe you shouldn't have replied to me

I'm still right tho

<:feelsgoodman:379788756980334592>

.416 Barrett MG...when?

well, you would be as you don't have any real life experience on the matter

What matter?

anything beyond an internet argument about global military

Never argued about military stuff

where you insist you know better than the said militaries

.50 BMG is strictly military

When did you buy your last Mk. 211?

We still talking armor penetration

Or we on long range anger

You fucking moron

The .50 is common with Longrange shooters

300 PRC master race

Well, I commented that a .416 isn't a superior all around cartridge over .50 BMG but apparently this fucko wasn't talking about that at all when replying to me.

It's not strictly military

Mk. 211 is.

Alot of long range loads are civilian

dude read what you are replying to

i don't disagree that a .416 is a better sniper cartridge than .50 BMG

50 is just big boi 30-06

That was the whole original argument

that's fair

no, it wasn't

416. Is necked sown 50 for better long range ballistics

Though it could be said that the .416 might be a better all around cartridge

Except the 50 incendiary rounds would obviously be more effective since they're larger<:thronk:441701565607444482>

Hmmm

What are we considering all around jobs ?

Idk...Accuracy, and penetration