Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 609464196215865355
Probably could be repurposed as one, yes...
A submerged tank ?
Because it has air tubes like a submarine to go submerge
complete random guess based on nothing but is it an E-25 Sturmgeschutz
Maus
I could see where you're getting the E-25 Sturmgeschutz from
It does sorta look like one
all I can guess is that it's some sort of TD
It is the E25
the back end anyway
The German designer tried to have it patented in the early 60s with the US
will PM you my home address for you to send the cookie to
interesting...
https://youtu.be/nz1-Jonr9wI
Yeah, I've been following this @Jabba's Soapbox
For those who don't want to go looking, the Tl;DR is this:
There's (way) TOO MANY opportunities for random chance and 'noise' in the evolutionary process, and the appearance of entirely new species is too sudden with little to no transition in a reasonable time in the fossil record.
This is not to say that there is a 'god' guiding this process, but that the evidence indicates external/unknown factors in the evolutionary process.
i.e. niches are filled VERY quickly with very little room for trial and error, and little divergence in phenotypes between niches. (Why does the Tasmanian Tiger look so similar to canines, despite being completely unrelated to them in every sense?)
the Add Shackleton did put out for his last expedition
an awful lot of problematic language in that advert <:triggered:382980748115968000>
@Capitán Alatriste related to a conversation we had a while back.
This is about the depravity of Berlin in the 1930s
And people that is a person that never have read any history books. Even Japan's history books attribute the nukes to their surrender
This is a common commie talking point
I find the siege of Budapest very interesting. I was able to visit the underground hospital bunkers wher le the last firefights took place
Dayum
is the term 'feudalism' inherently marxist or no?
"From your post, it would seem that you are interested in the shift in comparative economic power and enfranchisement away from landholders to capital owners. Or rather, because land can be classified as capital, owners of financial capital."
like wtf, lol
i think the actual definition is feudalism "landholders granted land on basis of loyalty to granter"
rather than "landholders granted land on basis of capital exchange"
simply saying 'capital exchange' destroys the leftist narrative, does it?
What the fuck are you on about? Lol
None of what you said makes sense
quite funny